Consciousness and complexity: Neurobiological naturalism and integrated information theory.
Francesco Ellia, Robert Chis-Ciure
Consciousness and Cognition April 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103281 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Artificial consciousness Integrated information theory Neurobiological naturalism |
| Key points | Compares Neurobiological Naturalism and Integrated Information Theory, assessing their similarities and differences, including their stances on artificial consciousness. |
Abstract
In this paper we take a meta-theoretical stance and compare and assess two conceptual frameworks that endeavor to explain phenomenal experience. In particular, we compare Feinberg & Mallatt's Neurobiological Naturalism (NN) and Tononi's and colleagues Integrated Information Theory (IIT), given that the former pointed out some similarities between the two theories (Feinberg & Mallatt 2016c-d). To probe their similarity, we first give a general introduction into both frameworks. Next, we expound a ground-plan for carrying out our analysis. We move on to articulate a philosophical profile of NN and IIT, addressing their ontological commitments and epistemological foundations. Finally, we compare the two point-by-point, also discussing how they stand on the issue of artificial consciousness.