Methodological issues in consciousness research: theory comparison, the role of empirical evidence, and a replication crisis.
Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, Andreas Stephens, Aron Balogh Sjöstrand, Morten Overgaard
Front Psychol September 23, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1633907 (opens in new tab) via PubMed Central
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe authors examine methodological challenges in consciousness research, focusing on how theories are compared, the role of empirical evidence, and a replication crisis. They argue that current approaches often lack rigorous theory comparison and that empirical evidence is sometimes insufficiently linked to theoretical predictions. The replication crisis further undermines confidence in findings. The paper calls for improved methods to ensure more reliable progress in understanding consciousness.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 4 |
| Key finding | Argues that consciousness research faces fundamental methodological problems, including difficulties in theory comparison, reliance on empirical evidence without clear predictions, and a replication crisis that undermines progress. |
Abstract
Methodological issues in consciousness research: theory comparison, the role of empirical evidence, and a replication crisis.