Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Caitlin Mills

3 papers in the library · 168 citations · publishing 2020-2023

Papers

Updating the dynamic framework of thought: Creativity and psychedelics.

Neuroimage March 8, 2020 Manesh Girn, Caitlin Mills, Leor Roseman et al. 139 citations

Creativity involves alternating between generating ideas and evaluating them. A refined Dynamic Framework of Thought describes creative generation not as one mental state but as a product of many varying states. The psychedelic state is proposed as a mental state with high potential for facilitating creative generation, making psychedelic substances useful experimental tools for studying the neuroscience of creativity.

Out of the blue: understanding abrupt and wayward transitions in thought using probability and predictive processing

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences December 13, 2020 Caitlin Mills, Andre Zamani, Rebecca White et al. 27 citations

Abrupt transitions in thought content occur at surprising times but lead to unsurprising content, while wayward transitions occur at surprising times and also lead to surprising content. The authors distinguish these two types using probabilistic and predictive processing concepts, employing transition and occurrence probability metrics. They discuss how these transitions may contribute to mental function and their possible neural implementation.

Cognitive control and semantic thought variability across sleep and wakefulness

March 14, 2023 Remington Mallett, Yasmeen Nahas, Kalina Christoff et al. 2 citations preprint

The flow of thought is persistent and sometimes unpredictable, and understanding what influences how thoughts shift from moment to moment has implications for disorders like schizophrenia and recurrent nightmares. This study examined whether cognitive control limits moment-to-moment content shifts across sleep and wakefulness. Thought variability was measured as semantic incoherence between sequential thought phrases in dreaming and waking reports. During wakefulness, on-task conditions showed reduced thought variability compared to off-task conditions, and thought variability was greater when thoughts wandered freely. During sleep, lucid dreams, which involve higher cognitive control, showed reduced thought variability compared to non-lucid dreams. These results suggest that cognitive control may limit thought variability across the 24-hour cycle of thought generation, consistent with the Dynamic Framework of Thought.