Cognitive control and semantic thought variability across sleep and wakefulness

The flow of thought is persistent and sometimes unpredictable, and understanding what influences how thoughts shift from moment to moment has implications for disorders like schizophrenia and recurrent nightmares. This study examined whether cognitive control limits moment-to-moment content shifts across sleep and wakefulness. Thought variability was measured as semantic incoherence between sequential thought phrases in dreaming and waking reports. During wakefulness, on-task conditions showed reduced thought variability compared to off-task conditions, and thought variability was greater when thoughts wandered freely. During sleep, lucid dreams, which involve higher cognitive control, showed reduced thought variability compared to non-lucid dreams. These results suggest that cognitive control may limit thought variability across the 24-hour cycle of thought generation, consistent with the Dynamic Framework of Thought.

Study at a glance

Abstract

The flow of thought is persistent, and at times merciless. Mental content is generated throughout the day and into the night, moving forward predictably at times but surprisingly at others. Understanding what influences the trajectory of thought—how thoughts continuously unfold over time—has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of thought disorders like schizophrenia and recurrent nightmares. Here, we examine whether cognitive control restricts moment-to-moment content shifts across sleep and wakefulness, thus acting as a fundamental constraint on thought variability. Thought variability was measured as the semantic incoherence between sequential thought phrases and was applied to independent datasets of dreaming and waking reports. Our results show that within both sleeping and waking reports, conditions typically marked by higher levels of cognitive control were associated with decreased thought variability (i.e., semantic incoherence). During wakefulness, on-task conditions were associated with reduced levels of thought variability compared to off-task conditions, and thought variability was greater when thoughts wandered around more freely. During sleep, lucid dreams, marked by higher levels of cognitive control, were associated with reduced levels of thought variability compared to non-lucid dreams. Together, these results suggest that cognitive control may limit thought variability across the 24-hour cycle of thought generation. Such findings are consistent with the Dynamic Framework of Thought, where mental states are expected to vary on a continuum of deliberate constraints, with lower cognitive control leading to a categorical cluster of spontaneous thought processes that includes both mind-wandering during wakefulness and non-lucid dreams during sleep. This observation has broad implications for models of cognition, specifically highlighting the continuity of cognitive processes throughout the circadian cycle and the importance of considering varying levels of thought constraint in both waking and dreaming states.