Out of the blue: understanding abrupt and wayward transitions in thought using probability and predictive processing
Caitlin Mills, Andre Zamani, Rebecca White, Kalina Christoff
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences December 13, 2020 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0692 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Surprise Phenomenology philosophy Perception Feeling Transition genetics Cognitive psychology Probabilistic logic Phenomenon Epistemology Cognitive science |
| Citations | 27 |
| Key points | Proposes that two types of surprising thought transitions—abrupt and wayward—can be distinguished by different probability metrics, and that these may contribute beneficially to mental function. |
Abstract
Thoughts that appear to come to us ‘out of the blue’ or ‘out of nowhere’ are a familiar aspect of mental experience. Such thoughts tend to elicit feelings of surprise and spontaneity. Although we are beginning to understand the neural processes that underlie the arising of such thoughts, little is known about what accounts for their peculiar phenomenology. Here, we focus on one central aspect of this phenomenology—the experience of surprise at their occurrence, as it relates to internal probabilistic predictions regarding mental states. We introduce a distinction between two phenomenologically different types of transitions in thought content: (i) abrupt transitions , which occur at surprising times but lead to unsurprising thought content, and (ii) wayward transitions , which occur at surprising times and also lead to surprising thought content. We examine these two types of transitions using a novel approach that combines probabilistic and predictive processing concepts and principles. We employ two different probability metrics—transition and occurrence probability—to characterize and differentiate between abrupt and wayward transitions. We close by discussing some potentially beneficial ways in which these two kinds of transitions in thought content may contribute to mental function, and how they may be implemented at the neural level. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation’.
Citations in the library
Cited by 7
- Prefrontal contributions to the stability and variability of thought and conscious experience Neuropsychopharmacology September 20, 2021
- Constructive episodic simulation in dreams PLoS One March 22, 2022
- Self-caught reports of dreaming and mind wandering in a naturalistic environment: an online questionnaire study Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences June 11, 2025
- The kaleidoscope of bizarreness: The analysis of first-person-reports shows the relationship between dreaming and mind wandering to be complex. Consciousness and Cognition 2026
- Spontaneously reported dreams and mind wandering in a naturalistic environment: An online questionnaire study April 29, 2024
and 2 more in the library
Cites 7
- REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics Pharmacological Reviews June 20, 2019
- Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013
- Dynamics of neural recruitment surrounding the spontaneous arising of thoughts in experienced mindfulness practitioners Neuroimage April 30, 2016
- Updating the dynamic framework of thought: Creativity and psychedelics. Neuroimage March 8, 2020
- Affective neuroscience of self-generated thought. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences May 12, 2018
and 2 more in the library