|
Motives and Side-Effects of Microdosing With Psychedelics Among Users
2019
|
cross-sectional survey |
1116 |
↕Mixed
|
Performance enhancement was the main motive for microdosing, negative effects were mostly acute psychological effects, and the most common reason for stopping was lack of effectiveness. |
|
Microdosing with psilocybin mushrooms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study
2022
|
double-blind placebo-controlled experiment |
34 |
→No effect
|
Acute subjective effects were stronger than placebo only in participants who correctly identified their condition, with reduced theta EEG power, but no effects on well-being, creativity, or cognition apart from small changes toward cognitive impairment. |
|
Psychedelic microdosing benefits and challenges: an empirical codebook
2019
|
mixed-methods |
|
?Unclear
|
Compiles participant-reported benefits and challenges into a taxonomy intended to frame future microdosing research targets. |
|
Might Microdosing Psychedelics Be Safe and Beneficial? An Initial Exploration.
2019
|
observational cohort |
1000 |
↑Supports
|
Repeated spaced microdoses of LSD were followed by improvements in negative moods, especially depression, and increases in positive moods, energy, and work effectiveness in self-reports. |
|
Microdosing psychedelics: Motivations, subjective effects and harm reduction
2019
|
cross-sectional survey |
525 |
↕Mixed
|
Participants microdosed mainly for mental health, personal development, and cognitive enhancement, and reported perceived short-term benefits in mood, connection, and cognition alongside unwanted effects such as stronger-than-expected psychedelic effects and anxiety. |
|
Microdosing psychedelics: Demographics, practices, and psychiatric comorbidities
2020
|
cross-sectional survey |
909 |
↕Mixed
|
Microdosers were less likely to report histories of substance use or anxiety disorders but more likely to report recent recreational substance use than non-microdosers. |
|
Psilocybin microdosing does not affect emotion-related symptoms and processing: A preregistered field and lab-based study
2021
|
randomized controlled trial |
|
→No effect
|
Psilocybin microdosing did not affect emotion processing or symptoms of anxiety and depression compared with placebo, and did not affect interoceptive awareness. |
|
Potential safety, benefits, and influence of the placebo effect in microdosing psychedelic drugs: A systematic review
2020
|
systematic review |
|
↕Mixed
|
Reports highly contradictory results showing both benefits and detriments of microdosing for mood, creative processes, and energy, with limitations including gender bias and heterogeneous dosing. |
|
Microdosing psychedelics: Subjective benefits and challenges, substance testing behavior, and the relevance of intention
2020
|
cross-sectional survey |
6753 |
↕Mixed
|
Participants often reported enhanced mood, creativity, focus, and sociability, the most common challenge was 'none', most did not test their substances, and an approach-intention predicted fewer rather than more benefits. |
|
Microdosing psilocybin for chronic pain: a case series
2022
|
case series |
3 |
↑Supports
|
Self-administered low-dose psilocybin produced pain relief without psychedelic effects in three patients, with relief sometimes magnified by exercise and repeated dosing. |
|
Psilocybin microdosers demonstrate greater observed improvements in mood and mental health at one month relative to non-microdosing controls
2022
|
naturalistic observational study |
1133 |
↑Supports
|
Psilocybin microdosing was associated with small- to medium-sized improvements in mood and mental health across gender, age, and mental health status, with psychomotor improvements specific to older adults. |
|
Effects of psilocybin microdosing on awe and aesthetic experiences: a preregistered field and lab-based study
2021
|
preregistered field and lab crossover study |
|
↕Mixed
|
Participants reported more awe during psilocybin microdosing than placebo, but about two-thirds broke blind, suggesting expectancy effects may drive subjective benefits. |
|
Psilocin and ketamine microdosing: effects of subchronic intermittent microdoses in the elevated plus-maze in male Wistar rats
2018
|
experimental study |
40 |
↓Opposes
|
Intermittent microdoses of psilocin or ketamine produced a mildly anxiogenic profile in rats, most significant at lower doses, though the conclusion was tentative. |
|
Repeated low doses of psilocybin increase resilience to stress, lower compulsive actions, and strengthen cortical connections to the paraventricular thalamic nucleus in rats.
2023
|
experimental study |
|
↑Supports
|
Repeated low doses of psilocybin were well tolerated, imparted stress resilience, reduced compulsive-like grooming, and increased 5-HT7 receptor expression and synaptic density in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus. |
|
The risk of chronic psychedelic and MDMA microdosing for valvular heart disease
2023
|
review |
|
↓Opposes
|
Psychedelics and MDMA can bind the 5-HT2B receptor, and chronic microdosing is a potential but unconfirmed risk for valvular heart disease, with no adequately designed animal or clinical studies found. |
|
Psilocybin Microdosing Schedules, 5-HT2A Adaptation, and the Age-Dependent Cortical State: From Intermittent to Continuous Exposure
2026
|
theoretical |
|
?Unclear
|
Argues that dosing schedule should be treated as an independent pharmacological variable, noting the first dedicated randomized trial in major depressive disorder (2 mg psilocybin weekly) did not beat placebo and that continuous exposure remains inadequately tested. |
|
Daily Psilocybin Microdosing as a Receptor-Adaptation Paradigm: A Testable 5-HT2A Down-Regulation Hypothesis
2026
|
theoretical |
|
?Unclear
|
Proposes that daily low-dose psilocybin may induce progressive 5-HT2A receptor desensitization, with fading subjective effects marking an adaptive state, and states this hypothesis is not evidence of efficacy. |
|
The subtle science: a systematic review of psilocybin magic mushroom and truffle microdosing
2026
|
systematic review |
3262 |
↕Mixed
|
Some studies suggested improvements in well-being, mental health, cognition, and other outcomes, but evidence was low certainty with high risk of bias and self-reported outcomes, and adverse events were rarely reported. |
|
Chronic psilocin microdosing produces limited behavioral effects and does not enhance neurogenesis in rats.
2026
|
preclinical experimental study |
|
→No effect
|
Chronic psilocin microdosing did not affect locomotor activity, depressive-like behavior, sociability, or novelty seeking and did not increase dentate gyrus cell proliferation, though a small anxiogenic effect was observed. |
|
Classical psychedelic microdosing, mood, and cognitive function: An umbrella review with narrative synthesis
2026
|
umbrella review |
1614 |
↓Opposes
|
The only significant pooled effect was a small decrease in cognitive control, and mood benefits were not replicated under placebo-controlled conditions. |
|
Characterizing Resting-State Brain Dynamics with Frequency-Resolved EEG Microstates: Parallel Analyses of Psilocybin Microdosing and Acute Inhaled DMT
2026
|
observational study |
|
↕Mixed
|
Psilocybin microdosing showed subtle EEG effects including reduced global field power and frequency-specific delta and theta microstate changes, with no significant broadband changes, unlike broader alterations under acute DMT. |
|
Prevalence and Reasons for Microdosing Cannabis, Psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA Among U.S. Adults
2026
|
cross-sectional survey |
1523 |
?Unclear
|
Lifetime microdosing prevalence was 5.3% for psilocybin and 4.8% for LSD, with psilocybin more commonly microdosed for recreational than medical purposes, and microdosing more common among those with poorer mental health. |
|
Psilocybin microdosing in the United States: Insights from a nationally representative survey
2026
|
survey study |
|
?Unclear
|
At least 8.4 million US adults reported lifetime psilocybin microdosing, with improving physical and mental health the top motivations. |
|
Safety and Efficacy of Microdosing Psilocybin over 8 Weeks for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2026
|
randomized controlled trial |
39 |
→No effect
|
Four weekly 2 mg psilocybin doses produced similar reductions in depression scores to placebo (mean difference -5.4 vs -6.0), showing no statistically greater efficacy than placebo. |
|
Microdosing psilocybin for major depressive disorder: study protocol for a phase II double-blind placebo-controlled randomised partial crossover trial
2026
|
RCT protocol |
40 |
?Unclear
|
Describes a planned double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 2 mg psilocybin versus placebo for depression; primary outcome results are not yet reported. |