|
Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for psychiatric and existential distress in patients with life-threatening cancer
2020
|
long-term within-subjects follow-up |
15 |
↑Supports
|
Reductions in anxiety, depression, hopelessness, demoralization, and death anxiety were sustained at 3.2 and 4.5 years, with 60-80% still meeting criteria for clinically significant antidepressant or anxiolytic responses. |
|
Acute and Sustained Reductions in Loss of Meaning and Suicidal Ideation Following Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy for Psychiatric and Existential Distress in Life-Threatening Cancer
2021
|
RCT secondary analysis |
|
↑Supports
|
Among participants with elevated baseline suicidal ideation, psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy was associated with within-group reductions in suicidal ideation apparent as early as 8 hours and persisting 6.5 months, plus large reductions in loss of meaning sustained to 4.5 years. |
|
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in the Context of Serious Illness.
2022
|
review |
|
↑Supports
|
Reports that one-time psychedelic-assisted therapy may lead to sustained reductions in anxiety, depression, and demoralization in seriously ill and end-of-life patients, while noting limited practical guidance for clinicians. |
|
The Potential of Psychedelics for End of Life and Palliative Care.
2022
|
review |
|
↑Supports
|
Argues that psychedelics may provide clinicians an additional psychopharmacological treatment for depression, existential distress, and well-being in end-of-life and palliative care. |
|
Psilocybin in Palliative Care: An Update.
2023
|
review |
|
↑Supports
|
Reports that psilocybin has significant and in some cases sustained anxiolytic, antidepressant, anti-inflammatory, and entheogenic effects with a favorable safety profile, while noting selection bias and short follow-up as limitations. |
|
Social acceptability of psilocybin-assisted therapy for existential distress at the end of life: A population-based survey
2024
|
cross-sectional survey |
2800 |
↑Supports
|
79.3% considered psilocybin-assisted therapy a reasonable medical choice for existential distress at the end of life, and 84.8% agreed the public health system should cover its costs. |
|
Exploring the Use of Psilocybin Therapy for Existential Distress: A Qualitative Study of Palliative Care Provider Perceptions
2021
|
qualitative descriptive study |
5 |
↕Mixed
|
Providers identified multiple barriers to addressing existential distress and expressed uncertainty about psilocybin's risks and benefits. |
|
Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for existential distress: practical considerations for therapeutic application—a review
2024
|
narrative review |
|
↑Supports
|
Reports that psilocybin and LSD combined with psychotherapy have shown rapid and sustained reductions in existential and psychiatric distress in patients facing life-threatening illness. |
|
Evaluating the effectiveness of psilocybin in alleviating distress among cancer patients: A systematic review.
2025
|
systematic review |
14 |
↑Supports
|
Across 14 studies (3 RCTs, 5 open-label trials, 5 qualitative studies, 1 case report), psilocybin therapy consistently reduced depression, anxiety, and existential distress, with improvements sustained over several months and generally mild, transient adverse effects. |
|
Psychedelics for the treatment of end-of-life distress in patients with a life-threatening disease.
2025
|
review |
|
↑Supports
|
Reports that psychedelic-assisted therapy is associated with highly significant and sometimes sustained decreases in depression and death anxiety, along with improvements in meaning, spiritual well-being, optimism, and life satisfaction. |
|
What do health professionals think about implementing psilocybin-assisted therapy in palliative care for existential distress? A World Café qualitative study.
2024
|
qualitative study |
16 |
↕Mixed
|
Professionals considered psilocybin-assisted therapy a treatment of interest but raised concerns about training, legalization, protocols, and eligibility criteria that need addressing for acceptability and access. |
|
Palliative care patients’ attitudes and openness towards psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for existential distress
2024
|
pilot survey study |
31 |
↕Mixed
|
51.6% expressed interest in future psilocybin treatment, with belief in its therapeutic benefits correlating with interest, while concerns included risk of psychosis, lack of trained providers, and potential for exploitation. |
|
Psilocybin-Assisted Early Palliative Care for Demoralization and Chronic Pain: An Open-Label Pilot Study.
2026
|
open-label pilot study |
11 |
↑Supports
|
A single 25 mg dose with multidisciplinary palliative care was safe and feasible, with 90% of dosed participants no longer meeting criteria for clinically significant demoralization and pain scores below the enrollment threshold by study endpoint. |
|
The need for another tool: Australian healthcare professionals on the use of psilocybin for existential distress in people with cancer
2026
|
qualitative study |
11 |
↕Mixed
|
Professionals remained interested in psychedelic-assisted therapy for existential distress but identified knowledge gaps, barriers, and a need for more research, preferring multidisciplinary, culturally sensitive, and ethically rigorous delivery. |
|
Bringing Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy to Palliative Oncology: Early Lessons from Real-World Implementation.
2026
|
single-case implementation study |
10 |
↓Opposes
|
Despite favorable views and modest estimated costs, no patients received psilocybin-assisted therapy after one year, indicating a gap between regulatory authorization and service uptake. |
|
Implementing psilocybin-assisted therapy in palliative care settings: A survey of stakeholders
2026
|
cross-sectional survey |
121 |
↑Supports
|
95% of physicians reported favorable attitudes toward psilocybin-assisted therapy, and 68% of stakeholders endorsed its introduction during early stages of illness; lack of trained providers was the primary barrier. |
|
Meaning and Psychedelics in Palliative Care: A Narrative Review.
2026
|
narrative review |
|
↑Supports
|
Reports that loss of meaning is a hallmark of demoralization and that psychedelic therapies show promise for existential distress and demoralization in palliative care. |
|
Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for psycho-existential distress in advanced cancer: a narrative review
2026
|
narrative review |
|
↑Supports
|
Argues that psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy is a compelling therapeutic option warranting further rigorous, interdisciplinary research for ethically grounded implementation in palliative settings. |
|
Sense-Making Around Psilocybin in UK Women Experiencing Cancer-Related Existential Distress: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
2026
|
qualitative study |
7 |
↑Supports
|
Participants considered psilocybin a much-needed alternative to traditional treatments for cancer-related depression and anxiety but felt its legal status was a significant barrier to access. |
|
PSilocybin for psYCHological and existential distress in PALliative care (PSYCHED-PAL): A single arm unblinded clinical trial
2026
|
open-label single-arm clinical trial |
20 |
↑Supports
|
Microdose psilocybin (1-3 mg over 3 weeks) was safe and feasible, with 69% of completers reporting meaningful global improvement and over half showing clinically significant reductions in depression and demoralization. |
|
Psilocybin-assisted therapy for individuals with palliative care needs: A systematic review of safety and efficacy
2025
|
systematic review |
74 |
↑Supports
|
Across six studies, psilocybin-assisted therapy produced clinically significant reductions in depression and anxiety, with 57-79% achieving at least 50% symptom reduction and improvements sustained up to 4.5 years with no serious adverse events. |
|
Supporting Meaningful Choices: A Decision Aid for Individuals Facing Existential Distress and Considering Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy
2025
|
descriptive study |
10 |
↑Supports
|
A decision aid for psilocybin-assisted therapy demonstrated satisfactory acceptability and usability, meeting IPDAS criteria for supporting shared decision-making. |