|
Psychedelic microdosing benefits and challenges: an empirical codebook
2019
|
mixed-methods study |
|
?Unclear
|
Develops a taxonomy of reported microdosing benefits and challenges to identify intervention targets for future research. |
|
Might Microdosing Psychedelics Be Safe and Beneficial? An Initial Exploration.
2019
|
observational cohort |
1000 |
↑Supports
|
Spaced but repeated microdoses of LSD (10 micrograms every three days) were followed by improvements in negative moods, especially depression, and increases in positive moods, energy, and work effectiveness. |
|
Preliminary Report on the Effects of a Low Dose of LSD on Resting-State Amygdala Functional Connectivity.
2019
|
RCT |
20 |
↕Mixed
|
A single 13 μg dose of LSD altered amygdala functional connectivity with several brain regions, and changes in amygdala–middle frontal gyrus connectivity were positively correlated with positive mood, though effects on mood itself were weak and variable. |
|
Acute Mood-Elevating Properties of Microdosed Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in Healthy Volunteers: A Home-Administered Randomized Controlled Trial.
2023
|
RCT |
80 |
↕Mixed
|
Microdosing LSD (10 μg every 3 days for 6 weeks) produced transient mood-elevating effects on dose days but no lasting improvements in overall mood or cognition, with treatment-related anxiety prompting withdrawal of 4 participants from the LSD group. |
|
Microdosing psychedelics: Subjective benefits and challenges, substance testing behavior, and the relevance of intention
2020
|
cross-sectional survey |
6753 |
↑Supports
|
Perceived benefits of microdosing greatly outweighed challenges, with enhanced mood, creativity, focus and sociability commonly reported, but most participants did not test their substances and approach-intention predicted fewer benefits. |
|
Low doses of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) increase reward-related brain activity.
2023
|
within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment |
18 |
↑Supports
|
Single low doses of LSD (13 μg and 26 μg) increased reward-related event-related potential components compared to placebo, indicating enhanced hedonic, motivational, and affective processing of reward feedback. |
|
The risk of chronic psychedelic and MDMA microdosing for valvular heart disease
2023
|
review |
|
↓Opposes
|
Chronic psychedelic microdosing may pose a risk of valvular heart disease due to activation of the 5-HT2B receptor, but no appropriately designed animal or clinical studies were found. |
|
Greater subjective effects of a low dose of LSD in participants with depressed mood.
2024
|
RCT |
39 |
↑Supports
|
A low dose of LSD (26 µg) produced more pronounced positive mood, stimulant-like effects, and altered states of consciousness in individuals with depressive symptoms compared to non-depressed individuals, with a greater decline in depression scores 48 hours after dosing. |
|
Microdosing Psychedelics: Current Evidence From Controlled Studies.
2024
|
systematic review |
|
↕Mixed
|
Acute microdoses of LSD (5-20 μg) dose-dependently altered blood pressure, sleep, neural connectivity, social cognition, mood, and pain perception, but repeated doses did not alter mood or cognition on any measure studied. |
|
An open-label pilot trial assessing tolerability and feasibility of LSD microdosing in patients with major depressive disorder (LSDDEP1).
2023
|
open-label pilot trial |
20 |
?Unclear
|
Describes the protocol for an 8-week LSD microdosing trial in patients with major depressive disorder to assess tolerability and feasibility; no results are reported. |
|
Set and setting in microdosing: an oft-overlooked principle.
2022
|
theoretical |
|
?Unclear
|
Argues that set and setting are crucial for determining microdosing outcomes and that their omission from clinical trials may explain contradictory findings. |
|
Macrodosing to microdosing with psychedelics: Clinical, social, and cultural perspectives
2022
|
review |
|
?Unclear
|
Argues that microdosing is a nascent practice with potential therapeutic and enhancement benefits, but its effects remain mostly unexplored in formal research. |
|
Sociological investigations of human enhancement drugs: The case of microdosing psychedelics
2021
|
commentary |
|
?Unclear
|
Argues that microdosing psychedelics represents an emerging facet of human enhancement through drugs and identifies directions for sociological study. |
|
Inter-individual variability in neural response to low doses of LSD.
2024
|
RCT |
53 |
↕Mixed
|
Acute responses to low doses of LSD (15 mcg) depended on baseline cognitive state, with stimulatory effects strongest in those with low arousal and attention and inhibitory effects strongest in high memory performers. |
|
Is microdosing a placebo? A rapid review of low-dose LSD and psilocybin research
2024
|
rapid review |
19 |
↕Mixed
|
Reviews 19 placebo-controlled microdosing studies and concludes that microdosing with LSD and psilocybin leads to changes in neurobiology, physiology, subjective experience, affect, and cognition relative to placebo, and that claims it is predominantly a placebo are premature. |
|
230. LSD microdosing for depression: hype or hope? A randomised controlled trial in major depressive disorder
2026
|
RCT |
|
→No effect
|
Microdosed LSD was not superior to active placebo (caffeine) for reducing depressive symptoms: MADRS scores fell 29.9% with LSD versus 36.4% with placebo, a non-significant difference with moderate evidence favoring the null. |
|
Prevalence and Reasons for Microdosing Cannabis, Psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA Among U.S. Adults
2026
|
cross-sectional survey |
1523 |
?Unclear
|
LSD was microdosed by 4.8% of respondents (lifetime), more commonly for recreational than medical purposes, and microdosing was more common among those with poorer mental health. |
|
A New Use for an Old Compound: Microdosing LSD to Reduce Fibromyalgia Symptoms
2026
|
preclinical animal study |
|
↑Supports
|
Microdosed LSD improved pain sensitivity, discomfort, and wellbeing measures in a mouse model of fibromyalgia in a sex- and route-dependent manner without major safety concerns. |
|
LSD microdosing for major depressive disorder: Mood and pharmacokinetic outcomes from a Phase 2a trial
2026
|
clinical trial |
|
↑Supports
|
Short-term mood improvements followed microdosed LSD (8 μg) in people with depression, with no tolerance or sensitisation observed despite dose titration. |
|
Self-medication with psychedelics: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of review-level evidence
2026
|
scoping review |
|
↑Supports
|
Individuals self-medicating with psychedelics, particularly psilocybin and LSD, report symptom relief for conditions such as cluster headache, with about 40% achieving full remission and 70% reporting preventive benefit. |
|
Effects of psychedelic microdosing on cognitive functions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2026
|
meta-analysis |
1614 |
↓Opposes
|
Microdosing classical psychedelics significantly decreased cognitive control with no detectable effects on other cognitive domains, and neither substance type, dosage, nor duration moderated the effects. |
|
It’s all about the relationship: The caregiver experience of supporting a person with advanced cancer going through an LSD microdosing trial
2026
|
theoretical |
|
?Unclear
|
Argues that caregivers should be included alongside patients in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials for cancer-related distress because of the bidirectional relationship in well-being between cancer dyads. |
|
Qualitative content analysis of expectations in participants with depression about to begin LSD microdosing treatment: Identifying the need for psychedelic expectancy measures.
2025
|
qualitative study |
23 |
?Unclear
|
Participants' expectations before microdosing LSD were shaped by media and prior treatment failure, with hope acting as both a motivator and a disappointment buffer. |
|
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP): A randomised, double-dummy, triple-blind, active placebo-controlled, parallel groups trial of LSD microdosing in patients with major depressive disorder (LSDDEP2)
2025
|
statistical analysis plan |
|
?Unclear
|
Specifies analyses to assess efficacy and safety of LSD versus active placebo (caffeine) in a trial of patients with major depressive disorder; no results are reported. |
|
LSD microdosing in major depressive disorder: results from an open-label trial
2025
|
open-label phase 2A trial |
19 |
↑Supports
|
Microdosed LSD (8 μg initially, then 6-20 μg twice weekly) was safe and feasible and was associated with a 59.5% reduction in depression scores sustained for up to six months, though limited by an open-label design and small sample size. |