|
Self-blinding citizen science to explore psychedelic microdosing.
2021
|
self-blinding citizen science initiative with placebo control |
191 |
→No effect
|
No significant between-group differences were found between microdose and placebo on psychological outcomes, suggesting anecdotal benefits are due to the placebo effect. |
|
Exploring the effect of microdosing psychedelics on creativity in an open-label natural setting
2018
|
preliminary study |
|
↑Supports
|
This open-label study found quantitative support for cognitive-enhancing properties of microdosing psychedelics, speculating that psychedelics optimize the balance between cognitive persistence and flexibility. |
|
Microdosing psychedelics: personality, mental health, and creativity differences in microdosers
2019
|
observational study |
|
↑Supports
|
Current and former microdosers scored lower on dysfunctional attitudes and negative emotionality and higher on wisdom, open-mindedness, and creativity compared to non-microdosing controls. |
|
Positive expectations predict improved mental-health outcomes linked to psychedelic microdosing
2021
|
prospective observational study |
81 |
↕Mixed
|
Improvements in well-being and mood were observed, but positive expectancy at baseline predicted these improvements, indicating a significant placebo response. |
|
Motives and Side-Effects of Microdosing With Psychedelics Among Users
2019
|
cross-sectional survey |
1116 |
↕Mixed
|
Performance enhancement was the main motive for microdosing, but the most common reason for stopping was lack of effectiveness, and negative effects were mostly acute and psychological. |
|
Microdosing with psilocybin mushrooms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study
2022
|
double-blind placebo-controlled experimental design |
34 |
→No effect
|
Low doses of psilocybin produced noticeable subjective effects and altered EEG rhythms but did not enhance well-being, creativity, or cognitive function, indicating that expectation underlies many reported benefits. |
|
Psychedelic microdosing benefits and challenges: an empirical codebook
2019
|
mixed-methods study |
|
↑Supports
|
Participant reports from the microdosing community were summarized into a taxonomy of high-potential intervention targets for future research. |
|
Might Microdosing Psychedelics Be Safe and Beneficial? An Initial Exploration.
2019
|
observational cohort |
1000 |
↑Supports
|
Spaced but repeated microdoses of LSD were followed by improvements in negative moods, especially depression, and increases in positive moods. |
|
Psychedelic Microdosing: A Subreddit Analysis
2019
|
content analysis |
|
↕Mixed
|
Self-reported benefits included cognitive and creative enhancement and reduced depression and anxiety, but limitations included adverse physical effects and concerns about dependence. |
|
Microdosing psychedelics: Motivations, subjective effects and harm reduction
2019
|
cross-sectional survey |
525 |
↑Supports
|
Microdosing was primarily used as a self-managed therapy for mental health, with perceived short-term benefits including improved mood and anxiety, enhanced connection, and cognitive enhancement. |
|
Psychedelic Microdosing: Prevalence and Subjective Effects
2020
|
cross-sectional survey |
2347 |
↑Supports
|
Microdosers attributed psychedelic microdosing with improving mood, decreasing anxiety, and enhancing memory, attention, and sociability. |
|
Chronic psilocin microdosing produces limited behavioral effects and does not enhance neurogenesis in rats.
2026
|
preclinical experimental study |
|
→No effect
|
Chronic psilocin microdosing did not affect locomotor activity, depressive-like behavior, sociability, or novelty seeking, and did not increase dentate gyrus cell proliferation, though a small anxiogenic effect was observed. |
|
Classical psychedelic microdosing, mood, and cognitive function: An umbrella review with narrative synthesis
2026
|
umbrella review with narrative synthesis |
1614 |
↕Mixed
|
The only significant pooled effect was a small decrease in cognitive control; mood benefits were not replicated under placebo-controlled conditions. |
|
Psychedelic Use, Microdosing, Motives, and Information and Product Sources Among Young Adults in the United States
2026
|
cross-sectional survey |
1614 |
?Unclear
|
Mental health symptoms and adverse childhood events were associated with psychedelic use, microdosing, and higher use motives, even among those using exclusively for nonmedical purposes. |
|
Beyond Psychedelic Microdosing: Therapeutic Potential, Neuropharmacology, and Safety Considerations in Low-Dose Psychoactive Use
2026
|
conceptual and comparative review |
|
?Unclear
|
Argues that microdosing research must classify substances by mechanism, dose-response, perceptibility, context, and evidence strength to produce interpretable scientific conclusions. |
|
Clinical improvement following an integrative iboga microdosing protocol in post-concussive and hypoxic brain injury syndromes: a case series
2026
|
case series |
3 |
↑Supports
|
All three participants showed progressive neurological recovery after a six-week integrative iboga microdosing protocol with psychotherapy, with two achieving complete symptom remission at long-term follow-up. |
|
U.S. Psychedelic Use and Microdosing in 2025: Insights from a Probability-Based and Nationally Representative Survey.
2026
|
survey |
|
?Unclear
|
Reports that microdosing psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA is a prevalent practice among users of psychedelic substances, providing data to inform policy discussions. |