Skip to content

Posterior cingulate cortex downregulation training using fMRI neurofeedback in adolescents with early life adversity exposure: a randomized, single-blind trial.

Xiaoqian Yu, Aki Tsuchiyagaito, Masaya Misaki, Gabe Cochran, Zsofia P Cohen, Manpreet K. Singh, Martin P. Paulus, Robin L Aupperle, Namik Kirlic

Translational Psychiatry July 13, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03445-w (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 83
Population Adolescents with and without early life adversity
Intervention neurofeedback-augmented mindfulness training
Duration One-week follow-up
Topics Meditation
Keywords Awareness practice Mindfulness for adolescents Emotional regulation Affect management Stress management Emotional control Early life adversity Early life stress Childhood trauma Adverse childhood experiences Adolescent mental health Youth well-being Teen emotional health Adolescent well-being
Citations 4
Key findings Adolescents with early life adversity showed greater difficulty down-regulating the posterior cingulate cortex compared to healthy controls, and neurofeedback-augmented mindfulness training did not outperform sham feedback in improving self-reported outcomes.

Abstract

Early life adversity (ELA) disrupts default mode network (DMN) integrity subserving self-referential processes involved in emotional awareness and regulation. Mindfulness training (MT) reduces self-referential processing and down-regulates the DMN. We employed neurofeedback-augmented mindfulness training (NAMT), combining a core mindfulness strategy (focusing on breath) with real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf) to modulate DMN by targeting the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). ELA-exposed (ELA; n = 43) and healthy control (HC; n = 40) adolescents completed a scan with three conditions: (a) Focus-on-breath (MT): rtfMRI-nf was presented as a variable-height bar, and adolescents attempted to lower the bar; (b) Describe: engaging self-referential processing; and (c) Rest. ELA were single-blind randomized to active PCC rtfMR-nf (NF; n = 22) or artificial feedback (SHAM; n = 21). Adolescents reported perceived stress, state mindfulness, and affect at baseline, post-training, and one-week follow-up. General linear models (GLMs) examined group differences (ELA vs. HC; NF vs. SHAM) on neural (MT vs. Describe) and self-report measures. ELA showed greater difficulty in PCC down-regulation relative to HC. For ELA, SHAM evidenced similar PCC down-regulation as active NF. All adolescents reported increased state mindfulness post-training. Relative to HC, ELA reported greater improvements in positive affect, negative affect and stress at follow-up. There was no difference in self-reported measures between active and SHAM. PCC responses in ELA confirm the region's utility as a potential treatment target. NAMT was feasible and acceptable for ELA-exposed adolescents, but may not enhance mindfulness training more than SHAM. Optimal strategies for enhancing PCC regulation in ELA may be elucidated with future research.

Explore topics