Skip to content

A science of chimeras? The implications of illusionism for non-human consciousness research

Leonard Dung, François Kammerer

Philosophical Psychology November 11, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2025.2587227 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 14
Key points Argues that if illusionism is true, research on non-human consciousness can be reconceived as studying the distribution of "quasi-phenomenal consciousness," but that this distribution is not highly informative; proposes a "zombie test" and five heuristics for identifying features valuable to non-human cognition research independently of their relation to consciousness.

Abstract

Illusionism states that phenomenal consciousness does not exist, even though it seems to exist. While illusionism is controversial, it is a serious contender among theories of consciousness. We argue that it has substantial and non-trivial implications for non-human consciousness research (NHCR), particularly for the study of the distribution of phenomenal consciousness across beings. If illusionism is true, NHCR can be pursued if conceptualized as investigating the distribution of quasi-phenomenal consciousness, i.e. the states which are misrepresented as phenomenally conscious in humans. However, we argue that knowing the distribution of quasi-phenomenal consciousness is not highly informative. For this reason, illusionism suggests that some approaches to NHCR should be preferred over others. Approaches which focus on features that provide valuable information about non-human cognition independently of their supposed relation to consciousness retain much of their value if illusionism is true. We propose a “zombie test” and five specific heuristics to help identifying such features. Consequently, empirical researchers who take illusionism seriously gain a reason to prioritize some methodological approaches over others.