Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Alex Kiefer

2 papers in the library · 6 citations · publishing 2025

Papers

How do inner screens enable imaginative experience? Applying the free-energy principle directly to the study of conscious experience.

Neuroscience of Consciousness January 1, 2025 Chris Fields, Mahault Albarracin, Karl Friston et al. 6 citations

The free-energy principle (FEP) constrains possible models of consciousness, especially those of attentional control and imaginative experiences like episodic memory and planning. The paper first reviews classical and quantum formulations of the FEP, focusing on multi-component systems where only some parts interact directly with the environment. It discusses internal boundaries structured as Markov blankets, which act as classical information channels. The analysis shows how this framework supports models of attention and imagination, explaining how imaginative experience can use the same spatio-temporal and object-recognition frames as ordinary perception, and how it can be internally generated yet still surprising. The paper concludes with implications for implementation, phenomenology, phylogeny, and the large variability of imaginative experience in humans.

Higher-order theories and the explanation of state consciousness

Alex Kiefer preprint

Self-representational theories of consciousness object to Higher-order Thought (HOT) theory because HOT theory explains conscious experience through an unconscious higher-order thought, which seems incompatible with our constant awareness of our own consciousness. This paper examines two interpretations of that objection. Under the weaker interpretation, the objection poses no real threat to HOT theory. Under the stronger interpretation, the objection applies equally to self-representational theories, leading to a regress of representational properties rather than mental states. The argument thus defends HOT theory against a common criticism by showing the objection either fails or equally undermines the alternative.