Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Kevin M. Riordan

10 papers in the library · 594 citations · publishing 2021-2026

Papers

The Empirical Status of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of 44 Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

Perspectives on Psychological Science February 16, 2021 Simon B. Goldberg, Kevin M. Riordan, Shufang Sun et al. 492 citations

Mindfulness-based interventions show superiority to passive controls across a wide range of populations, problems, interventions, comparisons, and outcomes, with effect sizes ranging from 0.10 to 0.89. Effects are typically smaller and less often statistically significant compared with active controls, though mindfulness-based interventions are similar or superior to specific active controls and evidence-based treatments. Heterogeneity is typically moderate, few consistent moderators are found, and results are generally robust to publication bias. Reporting of adverse effects is inconsistent, and statistical power may be lacking in meta-analyses, particularly for comparisons with active controls.

Alliance With an Unguided Smartphone App: Validation of the Digital Working Alliance Inventory

Assessment May 18, 2021 Simon B. Goldberg, Scott A. Baldwin, Kevin M. Riordan et al. 73 citations

A six-item Digital Working Alliance Inventory (DWAI) measuring the working alliance in unguided smartphone-based interventions shows good psychometric properties. In a cross-sectional survey of 290 meditation app users and the intervention arm of a randomized trial with 314 participants, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a single-factor structure. The DWAI demonstrated adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity (no association with social desirability, psychological distress, or preference for a waitlist condition). Convergent validity was supported by positive associations with perceived app effectiveness and preference for an app condition. DWAI scores positively predicted self-reported and objective app utilization. When assessed at Weeks 3 or 4, but not earlier, DWAI scores predicted pre-post reductions in psychological distress.

How often should I meditate? A randomized trial examining the role of meditation frequency when total amount of meditation is held constant.

Journal of Counseling Psychology March 1, 2024 Kevin M. Riordan, Otto Simonsson, Corrina Frye et al. 12 citations

A two-week compassion-based meditation program delivered via the Healthy Minds Program app was tested in undergraduates with elevated depression or anxiety (N=351). Participants were randomly assigned to either one 20-minute meditation per day or two 10-minute meditations per day. Both groups showed improvements in psychological distress, experiential avoidance, fear of missing out, loneliness, and self-compassion from before to after the intervention, and daily distress and loneliness also improved over time. No significant differences were found between the two dosing schedules on any measure. When total daily meditation time is equal, distributing practice into shorter sessions does not affect outcomes for distressed beginners.

Evidence for Bidirectional, Cross-Lagged Associations Between Alliance and Psychological Distress in an Unguided Mobile-Health Intervention.

Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science May 1, 2024 Simon B. Goldberg, Zishan Jiwani, Daniel M. Bolt et al. 8 citations

A strong working alliance significantly enhances engagement in smartphone-based interventions. In a study involving 302 participants, with 80% experiencing elevated depression or anxiety, bidirectional relationships were observed between psychological distress and alliance during a 4-week meditation program. Effect sizes ranged from -.09 to -.14, comparable to those seen in traditional psychotherapy. These findings suggest that measuring alliance could improve the effectiveness of mobile health tools, highlighting the importance of digital technology in mental health support.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-Based Well-Being Training in Public School System Employees During the COVID-19 Pandemic

March 30, 2021 Matthew J. Hirshberg, Corrina Frye, Cortland J. Dahl et al. 5 citations preprint

A four-week smartphone-based meditation app (Healthy Minds Program) reduced psychological distress and improved well-being among school system employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a randomized wait-list controlled trial with 662 participants (64% teachers), those assigned to the app showed significantly larger reductions in distress immediately after the intervention and at a three-month follow-up, with similar benefits on secondary outcomes such as perseverative thinking and social connection. The app was equally effective for participants with elevated baseline anxiety and depressive symptoms, and no evidence of elevated adverse events was found. The program may offer a scalable approach to supporting educator mental health.

How Often Should I Meditate? A Randomized Trial Examining the Role of Meditation Frequency When Total Amount of Meditation is Held Constant

February 19, 2023 Kevin M. Riordan, Otto Simonsson, Corrina Frye et al. 2 citations preprint

A two-week compassion-based meditation intervention delivered via the Healthy Minds Program app led to improvements in psychological distress, experiential avoidance, fear of missing out, loneliness, and self-compassion among undergraduates with clinically elevated depression and/or anxiety. Participants were randomized to either one 20-minute meditation per day (Massed condition) or two 10-minute meditations per day (Distributed condition). Both groups showed similar improvements, with no significant differences between conditions on any outcome. When total daily meditation time is held constant, distributing practice across the day does not appear to influence outcomes for distressed beginners, supporting flexibility in meditation scheduling.

Is Informal Practice Associated with Outcomes in Loving-Kindness and Compassion Training? Evidence from Pre-Post and Daily Diary Assessments

February 10, 2023 Qiang Xie, Kevin M. Riordan, Scott A. Baldwin et al. 2 citations preprint

Among clinically distressed adults with no meditation experience who used a smartphone-based loving-kindness and compassion training program for two weeks, those who increased their informal meditation practice (using techniques outside formal sessions) showed greater reductions in psychological distress and loneliness from before to after the intervention, though no changes in empathy or prosociality were observed. Daily analyses indicated that more informal practice on a given day predicted lower distress the next day, but not lower loneliness. Distress and loneliness did not predict subsequent informal practice. The findings suggest that informal practice may play a causal role in reducing distress, but further experimental studies are needed.

Prevalence and Predictors of Self-Reported Adverse Experiences in Digital Meditation Training: 2 Randomized Controlled Trials

JMIR Mental Health June 12, 2026 Polina Beloborodova, Lillian M. Smith, Kevin M. Riordan et al.

About 28% of distressed college students and 10% of distressed US adults reported at least one adverse experience during a digital meditation program, but rates did not differ between those who completed guided meditations and those who did not, suggesting the experiences were not caused by meditation itself. Higher baseline depression, anxiety, loneliness, experiential avoidance, and perceived barriers to meditation predicted more adverse experiences. Among those reporting adverse experiences, roughly 90% were glad to have learned to meditate. Participants used diverse coping strategies, often drawing on skills taught in the program. The findings indicate that adverse experiences during meditation training may reflect preexisting distress rather than iatrogenic harm.

Who Sticks with Meditation? Rates and Predictors of Persistence in a Population-based Sample in the USA.

Mindfulness January 1, 2023 Sin U Lam, Kevin M. Riordan, Otto Simonsson et al.

Almost half of a U.S. population-based sample (49.3%) had meditated at least once, and 35.0% had practiced in the past year. Persistence was measured as lifetime number of sessions and current practice frequency. Factors linked to greater persistence included having spoken with a meditation teacher, higher perceived effectiveness, positive social norms about meditation, lower perceived barriers, higher conscientiousness, a wellbeing growth mindset, and retreat experience. Factors linked to less persistence included first exposure through technology and having a mental health motivation. First exposure through a smartphone app or through friends and family showed no association with persistence.

Does meditation training promote pro-environmental behavior? A cross-sectional comparison and a randomized controlled trial

Journal of Environmental Psychology October 1, 2022 Kevin M. Riordan, D. Maccoon, B. Barrett et al.

Long-term meditators showed greater environmental attitudes but not pro-environmental behavior or sustainable well-being compared to non-meditators. An eight-week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program did not significantly improve pro-environmental behavior, environmental attitudes, or sustainable well-being relative to a waitlist or an active control group. However, participation in either meditation or active control training predicted increases in pro-environmental behavior and sustainable well-being compared to waitlist, though the well-being finding was not robust to multiple imputation. Meditation training may promote pro-environmental behavior and related variables, but the specific training tested does not appear uniquely effective.