A Neurofunctional Theory of Consciousness
Cambridge University Press eBooks September 12, 2005 DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511610608.012 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 89 |
| Key points | Argues that the philosophical literature on consciousness is overly focused on the hard problem, and proposes that researchers instead pursue more tractable questions: the What Problem (contents of conscious experience), the Where Problem (location in the brain), and the How Problem (how states become conscious). The author contends that progress is being made in identifying the neural basis of conscious experience. |
Abstract
Introduction: The Problems of Consciousness Reading the philosophical literature on consciousness, one might get the idea that there is just one problem in consciousness studies, the hard problem. That would be a mistake. There are other problems; some are more tractable, but none is easy, and all interesting. The literature on the hard problem gives the impression that we have made little progress. Consciousness is just an excuse to work and rework familiar positions on the mind–body problem. But progress is being made elsewhere. Researchers are moving toward increasingly specific accounts of the neural basis of conscious experience. These efforts will leave some questions unanswered, but they are no less significant for that. To move beyond the hard problem, I would like to consider some real problems facing consciousness researchers. First, there is a What Problem. This is the problem of figuring out what we are conscious of. What are the contents of conscious experience? For those looking at the brain, it is closely tied to a Where Problem. Where in the brain does consciousness arise? Locating consciousness may not be enough. We need to address a How Problem. How do certain states come to be conscious? This can be construed as a version of the hard problem, by asking it with right intonation: How could certain physical states possibly be experienced? But there is another reading that is also worth investigating.
Citations in the library
Cited by 18
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- The Philosophical Significance of Attention Philosophy Compass October 1, 2011
- Missing piece of the puzzle in the science of consciousness: Resting state and endogenous correlates of consciousness Consciousness and Cognition February 2, 2017
- Control Consciousness Topics in Cognitive Science March 8, 2010
- Gorillas in the missed (but not the unseen): Reevaluating the evidence for attention being necessary for consciousness Mind & Language August 31, 2018
and 13 more in the library