Skip to content

A Stress Reduction Program Adapted for the Work Environment: A Randomized Controlled Trial With a Follow-Up

Shirley Silva Lacerda, Stephen W. Little, Elisa Harumi Kozasa

Frontiers in Psychology May 9, 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00668 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 44
Population Workers in a business context with stress complaints
Duration Two eight-week programs with an eight-week follow-up period
Citations 22
Key findings PROGRESS, an in-situ mindfulness program adapted to business time constraints, was associated with improvements in non-severe psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, depression, stress, processing speed/attention, and mindfulness in the group that received it first compared with the delayed group, and similar improvements appeared when the delayed group later received it. The first group maintained its gains over an eight-week follow-up without further instruction.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate an in-situ stress reduction program, named PROGRESS, developed to meet the specific needs of workers in a business context and to research its impact upon non-severe psychiatric symptoms, stress, anxiety, depression, processing speed/attention and mindfulness.

Methods: Participants with stress complaints were randomized into two groups: the main intervention group: group 1-G1, (n=22); and the control group: group 2-G2, (n=22). The protocol was divided into three distinct phases for the purpose of the study. Both groups were evaluated at time 1-T1, before the first eight-week intervention, which only G1 received. The second evaluation was made on both groups at time 2-T2, immediately after this first program; in order to test the program’s replicability and investigate possible follow-up effects, an identical second eight-week program was offered to G2 during time 3-T3, while G1 was simply instructed to maintain the practice they had learned without further instruction between T2 and T3. A Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to investigate the construct validity of PROGRESS.

Results: Repeated measures MANOVA test, comparing G1 and G2, showed the effect of the intervention from T1 to T2 (p=0.021) and from T2 to T3 (p=0.031). Univariate analysis showed that participants from G1 improved levels of non-severe psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, depression, stress, processing speed/attention and mindfulness when compared with G2, from T1 to T2 (p<0.05). After the participants in G2 received the intervention (T2-T3), this group also showed improvement in the same variables (p<0.05). At the end of their follow-up period (T2-T3) - during which they received no further support or instruction - G1 maintained the improvements gained during T1-T2. The two main components were stress (stress in the last 24-hours, in the last week and last month) and mental health (non-severe psychiatric symptoms, depression, anxiety and mindfulness).

Conclusion: PROGRESS, an in-situ mindfulness program adapted to fit within the reality of business time constraints, was effective at replicating in more than one group the reduction of stress, depression, anxiety, non-severe psychiatric symptoms, processing speed and also the improvement of attention skills, showing sustained improvement even after 8-weeks follow-up.

Citations in the library

Explore topics