Sensibility, values and selfhood
Roberta de Monticelli
The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy September 3, 2018 DOI: 10.4324/9780429470141-10 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 5 |
| Key points | Argues that feeling has its own specific intentionality, captured by three principles drawn from phenomenological literature, and that emotional life is crucial in shaping personhood, personal identity, and the foundations of practical reason. Proposes that value experience involves two levels of affective sensibility, one basically embodied and one cognitively "higher" and tied to rational and moral agency. |
Abstract
Contemporary philosophical research on emotions has focused on their intentionality, in particular on the specific intentional work done by feeling (“feeling-towards”, in Peter Goldie’s positive phrasing, as opposed to a tendency to “over-intellectualize” emotions, that is, to explain them in terms of beliefs and desires, or to reduce them to purely subjective states or qualia). But is there any satisfactory general theory of feeling, capable of putting some order into a stunning variety of affective phenomena, often piled up quite haphazardly? After discussing Goldie’s approach, focusing on the relation between emotions and values, which is much discussed in contemporary analytic philosophy (§1), this chapter, drawing on classic sources in phenomenological literature, provides three principles that define feeling’s specific intentionality (§2). On the basis of these three principles, I attempt to outline a full-fledged phenomenology of feeling (§3), showing the crucial role played by emotional life in shaping personhood, personal identity and the foundations of practical reason. Finally, I suggest some answers to questions raised in the preceding sections, including the crucial one about the connection between two levels of affective sensibility that appear to be involved in value experience: one that is basically embodied and one that is cognitively of a “higher” level, involved in a large variety of acts and behaviors characteristic of a rational and moral agent, such as a human being (§4).