Skip to content

Value in Consciousness: How Is It Phenomenologically Realized?

Igor W. Kirsberg

Voprosy Filosofii April 6, 2025 DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2025-4-94-103 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that value is best understood as an emotion with a positive or negative sign, grounded in a non-cognitive conception of emotion, and that cognitive accounts supposing an intentional-objective structure of value fail to explain value's specificity, producing unclear 'cognitive-emotional mixtures'. Proposes that an emotional stream of spontaneous senses explains value's gradual positive/negative differences and its coincidence with estimation.

Abstract

The article denotes the understanding of value as an emotion with a positive/ne­gative sign. This understanding is grounded by the understanding of emotion as a non-cognitive stream of senses and, using the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl, it rejects the basic understanding of value and emotion as cognitive. The cognitive understanding as supposing intentional-objective structure of con­sciousness does not demonstrate the specificity of value; in specifying inten­tional-objective structure of value cognitive understanding creates cognitive-emotional mixtures with an unclear mechanism – how valuable apperception, de­light and emotion would produce value and understand it, involve it in value and demonstrate it. A possibility of non-emotional understanding of value is also un­clear – how apperception would be valuable and would replace active delight and how delight or emotion would be in principle suppressed. Our under­standing, on the contrary, does not suppose any intentional-objective structure of value, preliminary preventing the denoted uncertainty. An emotional stream is realized in spontaneous trials of senses as not forming a basis for acts, but press­ing them to senses as they come in emotion. On this basis the gradual and posi­tive/negative differences of value, its coincidence with estimation and its general specificitare understandable (unconnected with the content of its material).

Explore topics