Skip to content

Mapping the Affective Dimension of Embodiment With the Sensation Manikin: Validation Among Chronic Pain Patients and Modification by Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement

Adam W. Hanley, Eric L Garland

Psychosomatic Medicine September 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000725 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational validation study with a randomized controlled comparison Peer reviewed
Sample size 199
Population Opioid-treated chronic pain patients (n = 108) and healthy controls (n = 91)
Intervention Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE)
Measures digital sensation manikin (SM)
Topics Meditation
Key findings The digital sensation manikin showed discriminant, construct, and incremental validity, and was associated with an objective measure of pain attentional bias. Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement significantly increased the ratio of pleasant to unpleasant sensations relative to an active control, suggesting that measuring both pleasant and unpleasant sensations broadens pain assessment.

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Objective: Mindfulness-based interventions target novel pain relief mechanisms not captured by legacy pain scales, including 1) cultivating awareness of pleasant and neutral sensations proximal to unpleasant sensations and 2) interoceptively mapping sensation location and spatial distribution.

Methods: We created a digital sensation manikin (SM) by overlaying a human figure silhouette with a grid of 469 “sensation” pixels. A series of five research questions examined the SM’s discriminant validity, construct validity, incremental validity, convergence with an objective measure of pain attentional bias, and sensitivity to a mindfulness-based psychological treatment, Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE). A sample of opioid treated chronic pain patients (n = 108; age, 53.79 (12.94) years; female, 65%) was recruited to answer research questions 1 to 5, and a sample of healthy controls (n = 91; age, 36.47 (13.50) years; female, 55%) was recruited as the comparison group for research question 1.

Results: Chronic pain patients reported significantly more unpleasant sensations than did healthy controls (p < .001, d = 1.23) and significantly fewer pleasant sensations (p = .001, d = 0.50). The SM also evidenced expected relationships with multiple measures of pain (r = 0.26–0.29) and well-being (r = −0.21 to 0.28), uniquely predicted pain interference (β = −0.18), and exhibited a significant association with pain attentional bias (r = 0.25). Finally, mindfulness-based intervention via MORE significantly increased the ratio of pleasant to unpleasant sensations reported by chronic pain patients relative to an active control condition (p = .036, d = 0.51).

Conclusions: This study supports the SM’s validity and indicates that assessing both pleasant and unpleasant sensations broadens the scope of pain measurement. Although the SM would benefit from further optimization, its continued use is likely to contribute to improved assessment and treatment options for chronic pain patients.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation Healthy employees in a work environment 2003 Randomized controlled trial n = 41
Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2000 Randomized controlled trial n = 145
Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Working adults 2008 Randomized controlled trial n = 139
Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation Undergraduate Chinese students 2007 Randomized controlled trial n = 40
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: Replication and Exploration of Differential Relapse Prevention Effects. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2004 Randomized controlled trial n = 73

Citations in the library

Cited by 8

and 3 more in the library

Cites 12

and 7 more in the library

Explore topics