Pain regulation during mindfulness meditation: Phenomenological fingerprints in novices and experts practitioners
Stefano Poletti, Oussama Abdoun, Jelle Zorn, Antoine Lutz
European Journal of Pain April 2, 2021 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1774 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Mixed-methods study combining interpretative-phenomenological qualitative approach with experimental thermal pain paradigm Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 62 |
| Population | 32 novices who received short meditation training and 30 experts in meditation practice (more than 10,000 lifetime hours) |
| Intervention | short meditation training |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Mind-wandering Psychotherapist Interpretative phenomenological analysis Rumination Experiential learning Flexibility engineering Qualitative research Cognition Cognitive psychology |
| Citations | 25 |
| Key findings | Five phenomenological clusters describing pain response strategies were identified, with expert meditators predominantly in clusters that thematized pain as an opportunity for metacognitive insights and deconstructing suffering, each cluster correlating with a unique profile of self-reports during a pain paradigm. |
Abstract
Background: The way people respond to pain is based on psychological mechanisms, beliefs and expectations. Mindfulness meditation (MM) has been shown to regulate pain and mental suffering through different mechanisms such as positive reappraisal, attentional and emotional regulation. Yet, subjective experience and meaning of pain in connection with MM are still largely unexplored.
Methods: The present mixed-methods study combined an interpretative-phenomenological qualitative approach with an experimental thermal pain paradigm to explore and compare the meaning of experiencing pain in 32 novices who received short meditation training and 30 experts in meditation practice (more than 10, 000 hr in life). We collected the qualitative data during in-depth semi-structured interviews where we probed participants' response strategies. During the pain task, we collected self-reports of intensity and unpleasantness, while after the task we collected self-reports of avoidance, openness, vividness and blissfulness.
Results: Five phenomenological clusters (PhC) emerged from the interviews, including three which described pain as an unpleasant sensation calling for: (1) experiential avoidance-suppression, (2) volitional agency-distanciation, or (3) a positive cognitive reappraisal and flexibility. Two additional clusters (4-5), containing mostly expert meditators, thematized pain sensation as an opportunity to gain metacognitive insights about mental processes, and to deconstruct one's suffering through these insights. PhC5 further integrates these insights with the recognition that suffering is part of the shared human experience and with the aspiration to relieve others from suffering. Each PhC was correlated to a unique profile of self-reports during the pain paradigm.
Conclusion: These findings need to be replicated in patients and practicing MM. They also warrant the integration of this mixed-method approach with brain imaging data to refine the experiential neuroscience of pain.
Significance: We compared the meaning of experiencing and regulating pain in novices and expert meditators using qualitative interviews. We identified five phenomenological clusters describing relevant features implicated in pain response strategies and meditation. These clusters were organized along a pseudo-gradient, which captured meditation expertise and predicted self-reports related to a pain paradigm and psychometric scales associated with pain and its regulation. These findings advance our understanding of the metacognitive mechanisms and beliefs underlying mindfulness meditation and can inform pain treatment strategies.