Skip to content

Consciousness Ain’t All That

Neil Levy

Neuroethics April 24, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-024-09559-0 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that accounts grounding moral considerability in phenomenal consciousness rely on question-begging arguments and fail to explain apparent differences in moral status across and within species. Proposes that moral considerability be grounded in functional properties instead, with phenomenal consciousness possibly sufficient but not necessary for moral value and contributing relatively little to overall considerability.

Abstract

Most philosophers think that phenomenal consciousness underlies, or at any rate makes a large contribution, to moral considerability. This paper argues that many such accounts invoke question-begging arguments. Moreover, they’re unable to explain apparent differences in moral status across and within different species. In the light of these problems, I argue that we ought to take very seriously a view according to which moral considerability is grounded in functional properties. Phenomenal consciousness may be sufficient for having a moral value, but it may not be necessary, and it may contribute relatively little to our overall considerability.

Citations in the library