Skip to content

Phenomenal Intentionality

David Pitt

The Quality of Thought January 11, 2024 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198789901.003.0002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Dretske-inspired causal-informational-teleological theories of conceptual intentionality face problems due to their exclusion of subjective aspects of intentionality, and that a phenomenal-intentionalist, internalist approach avoids these problems. Offers two arguments for internalism about thought content: one from the possibility of propositional hallucination and one from the impossibility of propositional illusion.

Abstract

Abstract This chapter presents a series of problems for Dretske-inspired causal-informational-teleological theories of conceptual intentionality, which I take to be the best hope for the naturalization of intentionality. It argues that these problems arise from the exclusion of the subjective aspects of intentionality, and that the phenomenal-intentionalist approach avoids them. This approach is resolutely internalist, and as such is very much against the grain of recent mainstream analytic philosophy of mind (and language). The chapter presents two arguments for internalism about thought content, one based on the possibility of propositional hallucination, and one based on the impossibility of propositional illusion.

Citations in the library

Explore topics