Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap
Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge 2007 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195171655.003.0009 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 95 |
| Key points | Argues that the explanatory gap between physical processes and consciousness may stem from the relationship between our concepts, not from an ontological divide. |
Abstract
Abstract Philosophers have reacted in different ways to the apparent explanatory gap between physical processes and consciousness. Some deny that any explanatory gap exists at all. Some hold that there is an explanatory gap for now, but that it will eventually be closed. Some hold that the explanatory gap corresponds to an ontological gap in nature. This chapter explores another reaction to the explanatory gap — those who react in this way agree that there is an explanatory gap, but they hold that it stems from the way we think about consciousness. In particular, this view locates the gap in the relationship between our concepts of physical processes and our concepts of consciousness, rather than in the relationship between physical processes and consciousness themselves.
Citations in the library
Cited by 10
- Phenomenal Concepts Philosophy Compass March 28, 2011
- The Normative Challenge for Illusionist Views of Consciousness Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy October 16, 2019
- On The Infinitely Hard Problem Of Consciousness Australasian Journal of Philosophy June 9, 2010
- Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Buddhist Thought Philosophy Compass October 1, 2012
- The Solution to the Mind-body Problem: The Complete Reduction of the Human Mind to Matter, Namely to the Brain Sociology and Anthropology April 1, 2017
and 5 more in the library