Skip to content

No evidence that pain is painful neural process

Riccardo Manzotti

Animal Sentience August 3, 2026 DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1034 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Neuroscience and neurobiology Philosophy of science
Key points Argues that Key's claim that fish lack pain because they lack mammalian neural structures is unsupported, since no mammalian structure has been proven sufficient for pain, and contingent necessity in mammals does not imply necessity in all organisms.

Abstract

Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a contingent causal role in generating and feeling pain in mammals. I counterargue that no conclusive evidence supports the sufficiency of any mammalian neural structure to produce pain. We cannot move from contingent necessity in mammals to necessity in every organism.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics