Skip to content

Participants' Perspective on the Competence of Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching: Development and Validation of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions-Participants' Assessment of Teaching (MBI:PAT) Questionnaire.

Jesus Montero-Marin, Eleanor-Rose Farley, Shannon Maloney, Rebecca S. Crane, Paul D'Alton, Rebecca Eldridge, Fabio Giommi, Gemma M Griffith, Frederick M Hecht, Verena Hinze, Eric B Loucks, Clara Strauss, Laura Taylor, Ruth A. Baer, Willem Kuyken

Mindfulness September 3, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Scale development and validation study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Measures Mindfulness-based Interventions: Participants' Assessment of Teaching (MBI:PAT)
Topics Meditation
Keywords Questionnaire Mindfulness-based Teaching competence Mbi
Registration NCT05154266
Key points The MBI:PAT, a 24-item participant-rated measure of mindfulness-based intervention teaching competence, showed a one-factor structure with excellent fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.03), excellent internal consistency (omega = 0.99), and construct, convergent, and divergent validity, with invariance across age and gender. The authors propose it for use in teaching, training, and research.

Abstract

Objectives: No participant-rated tool exists for assessing MBI teaching competence. This study aimed to develop and validate the MBI:PAT to address this limitation. The primary objective was to develop a new measure, the Mindfulness-based

Interventions: Participants' Assessment of Teaching" (MBI:PAT), and to evaluate its psychometric properties across several studies using independent samples.

Method: The MBI:PAT was based on a theoretically and empirically supported operational definition of teaching competence and comprised 24 key features across the domains of coverage, pacing, and organization; relational skills; embodying mindfulness; guiding mindfulness practices; conveying course themes through interactive inquiry and didactic teaching; and holding the group's learning environment. Across five studies, items were generated, refined, and validated using independent samples to assess factor structure, reliability, and validity.

Results: Findings support a 24-item questionnaire, with excellent internal consistency (ω = 0.99) and construct, convergent, and divergent validity, with a one-factor structure (CFI = 1.00; TLI = 1.00; RMSEA = 0.04, 90% CI [0.03, 0.05]; SRMR = 0.03). The measure demonstrates robust invariance across age and gender.

Conclusions: The MBI:PAT provides a psychometrically robust measure of MBI teaching competence from participants' perspective that can be used in teaching, training and research. Future research is needed to explore its performance across a wider range of teaching competence, and its relationship to key process and outcome variables. Pre-registration: Sub-study (5) was pre-registered (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05154266). Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8.

Citations in the library

Explore topics