Quining diet qualia.
Consciousness and Cognition June 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 47 |
| Key points | Argues that the diet notion of qualia has no distinctive content and should be abandoned, leaving only our dispositions to judge that experiences have classic qualia as what needs explaining. |
Abstract
This paper asks whether we can identify a neutral explanandum for theories of phenomenal consciousness, acceptable to all sides. The 'classic' conception of qualia, on which qualia are intrinsic, ineffable, and subjective, will not serve this purpose, but it is widely assumed that a watered-down 'diet' conception will. I argue that this is wrong and that the diet notion of qualia has no distinctive content. There is no phenomenal residue left when qualia are stripped of their intrinsicality, ineffability, and subjectivity. Thus, if we reject classic qualia realism, we should accept that all that needs explaining are 'zero' qualia - our dispositions to judge that our experiences have classic qualia. Diet qualia should, in Dennett's phrase, be quined.
Citations in the library
Cited by 17
- The Normative Challenge for Illusionist Views of Consciousness Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy October 16, 2019
- Is the Mind a Magic Trick? Illusionism about Consciousness in the “Consciousness-Only” Theory of Vasubandhu and Sthiramati Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy February 18, 2025
- What is consciousness and what it is for. An introduction to extended information theory. Frontiers in Psychology 2025
- The Science of Sirens June 11, 2026
- Arguing for Illusionism June 11, 2026
and 12 more in the library