Skip to content

Quining Diet Qualia Part II

Keith Frankish, Maxim Gorbachev

Voprosy Filosofii August 1, 2024 DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2024-8-48-59 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the diet notion of qualia has no distinctive content and that, if classic qualia realism is rejected, only "zero" qualia—dispositions to judge that experiences have classic qualia—remain to be explained.

Abstract

This is the second part of the article by Keith Frankish Quining Diet Qualia, which asks whether we can identify a neutral explanandum for theories of phe­nomenal consciousness, acceptable to all sides. The “classic” conception of qualia, on which qualia are intrinsic, ineffable, and subjective, will not serve this pur­pose, but it is widely assumed that a watered-down “diet” conception will. I ar­gue that this is wrong and that the diet notion of qualia has no distinctive con­tent. There is no phenomenal residue left when qualia are stripped of their intrinsicality, ineffability, and subjectivity. Thus, if we reject classic qualia real­ism, we should accept that all that needs explaining are “zero” qualia – our dis­positions to judge that our experiences have classic qualia. Diet qualia should, in Dennett’s phrase, be quined