Experiencing without knowing? Empirical evidence for phenomenal consciousness without access.
Yoni Zion Amir, Yaniv Assaf, Yossi Yovel, Liad Mudrik
Cognition September 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105529 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental study Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 80 |
| Population | Human participants (Experiment 1, N = 40; Experiment 2, N = 40) |
| Keywords | Access consciousness Cognition Phenomenal consciousness Qualia Unconscious processing |
| Citations | 25 |
| Key findings | Phenomenal and access consciousness can be empirically dissociated: participants can have a phenomenal experience without online access to it, and this cannot be fully explained by unconscious processing. |
Abstract
Can one have a phenomenal experience to which one does not have access? That is, can you experience something without knowing? The dissociation between phenomenal (P) and access (A) consciousness is widely debated. A major challenge to the supporters of this dissociation is the apparent inability to experimentally demonstrate that P-without-A consciousness exists; once participants report having a P-experience, they already have access to it. Thus, all previous empirical support for this dissociation is indirect. Here, using a novel paradigm, we create a situation where participants (Experiment 1, N = 40) lack online access to the stimulus yet are nevertheless able to retrospectively form judgements on its phenomenal, qualitative aspects. We further show that their performance cannot be fully explained by unconscious processing or by a response to stimulus offset (Experiment 2, N = 40). This suggests that P and A consciousness are not only conceptually distinct, but might also be teased apart empirically. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: A critical question in the scientific quest towards solving the problem of consciousness focuses on the ability to isolate conscious experiences at their purity, without any accompanying cognitive processes. This challenge has been augmented by a highly influential - yet controversial - dissociation suggested by the philosopher Ned Block between Phenomenal consciousness, or the "what it is like" to have an experience, and Access consciousness, indexing the ability to report that one has that experience. Critically, these two types of consciousness most typically go together, making it highly difficult - if not impossible - to isolate Phenomenal consciousness. Our work shows that the dissociation between phenomenal and access consciousness is not merely conceptual, but can also be empirically demonstrated. It further opens the gate to future studies pinpointing the neural correlates of the two types of consciousness.
Citations in the library
Cited by 13
- Consciousness science: where are we, where are we going, and what if we get there? Frontiers in Science October 30, 2025
- Taking consciousness for real: Increasing the ecological validity of the study of conscious vs. unconscious processes. Neuron May 15, 2024
- Event-related potential correlates of consciousness in simple auditory hallucinations. Neuroimage April 15, 2025
- On a confusion about there being two types of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences December 17, 2025
- Methodological issues in consciousness research: theory comparison, the role of empirical evidence, and a replication crisis. Frontiers in Psychology September 23, 2025
and 8 more in the library
Cites 16
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- Two neural correlates of consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences January 13, 2005
- Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews December 17, 2011
- How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences July 1, 2010
and 11 more in the library