Skip to content

Future directions in meditation research: Recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science

Cassandra Vieten, Helané Wahbeh, B Rael Cahn, Katherine A Maclean, Mica Estrada, Paul J Mills, Michael J. Murphy, Shauna L. Shapiro, Dean Radin, Zoran Josipovic, David E. Presti, Michael Sapiro, Jan Chozen Bays, Peter Russell, David R. Vago, Fred Travis, Roger Walsh, Arnaud Delorme

PLoS One November 7, 2018 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205740 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional online survey Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,120
Population Meditators
Topics Altered states of consciousness Philosophy of mind Meditation
Keywords Meditation experiences Meditative phenomena Spiritual experiences Psychological experiences Profound experiences Extraordinary experiences Diverse phenomena Meditation effects Subjective experiences Meditation research Contemplative science Scientific exploration Empirical study Survey research Psychological research Spiritual research Scientific validation New research avenues Spiritual psychology Transpersonal psychology Human potential Spiritual development Psychological well-being Mind-body connection Profound phenomena Unconventional meditation outcomes Exceptional human experiences
Citations 124
Key findings The majority of meditators report having had anomalous and extraordinary experiences during meditation, which are often neglected in research.

Abstract

The science of meditation has grown tremendously in the last two decades. Most studies have focused on evaluating the clinical effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions, neural and other physiological correlates of meditation, and individual cognitive and emotional aspects of meditation. Far less research has been conducted on more challenging domains to measure, such as group and relational, transpersonal and mystical, and difficult aspects of meditation; anomalous or extraordinary phenomena related to meditation; and post-conventional stages of development associated with meditation. However, these components of meditation may be crucial to people's psychological and spiritual development, could represent important mediators and/or mechanisms by which meditation confers benefits, and could themselves be important outcomes of meditation practices. In addition, since large numbers of novices are being introduced to meditation, it is helpful to investigate experiences they may encounter that are not well understood. Over the last four years, a task force of meditation researchers and teachers met regularly to develop recommendations for expanding the current meditation research field to include these important yet often neglected topics. These meetings led to a cross-sectional online survey to investigate the prevalence of a wide range of experiences in 1120 meditators. Results show that the majority of respondents report having had many of these anomalous and extraordinary experiences. While some of the topics are potentially controversial, they can be subjected to rigorous scientific investigation. These arenas represent largely uncharted scientific terrain and provide excellent opportunities for both new and experienced researchers. We provide suggestions for future directions, with accompanying online materials to encourage such research.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics