The Metaphysics Matrix Questionnaire: the development of an accessible measure of belief change for the general population
Jamie Rennie, Peter Sjöstedt-hughes, Celia J. A. Morgan
Research Square November 9, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3494308/v1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Scale development study |
|---|---|
| Citations | 5 |
| Key points | The authors propose the Metaphysics Matrix Questionnaire (MMQ), developed by combining 68 literature-derived items with 43 newly created items. Factor analysis yielded an eight-factor structure of metaphysical belief categories, and after item reduction 73 items across these factors form the proposed questionnaire. The authors argue the MMQ could offer insights into beliefs and their impact on mental health outcomes, and note it requires further validation. |
Abstract
Abstract Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests that people may undergo substantial shifts in their Metaphysical beliefs (MPBs) following non-ordinary states of consciousness induced by experiences such as meditation, breathwork, near-death, and psychedelics. Despite this, existing measures for assessing MPBs are limited in scope and interpretability, prompting the current study’s objective: to develop a comprehensive and user-friendly questionnaire capable of capturing a diverse range of belief constellations, whilst remaining theoretically informed. Towards this aim, the curation of belief statements for the Metaphysics Matrix Questionnaire (MMQ) used both theory-driven and data-driven methods. 68 Existing items were selected from the literature and combined with 43 newly created items aimed at covering under-addressed metaphysical positions. A factor analysis revealed an eight-factor solution, grouping beliefs into the following broad stroke categories: 1) Religiosity/Spirituality; 2) Physicalism; 3) Transcendency; 4) Panpsychism/Cosmopsychism; 5) Determinism/Fatalism/Low-autonomy; 6) Pseudo-Emergentism; 7) High-autonomy/Moral; 8) Randomness. Following item reduction, 73 items across these factors serve as the basis for the proposed Questionnaire. The MMQ’s potential applications offer valuable insights into beliefs and their impact on mental health outcomes. We provide a discussion on the merits of theory-driven vs data-driven approaches, limitations of the current study, and provide suggestions for future research toward validating the MMQ going forward.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Navigating groundlessness: An interview study on dealing with ontological shock and existential distress following psychedelic experiences. PLoS One 2025
- Investigating the relationship between changes in metaphysical beliefs and death anxiety following a significant psychedelic experience. Death Studies 2025
- Endorsement of metaphysical idealism mediates a link between past use of psychedelics and wellbeing Scientific Reports June 10, 2024
- Ontologically Challenging Psychedelic Experiences: Considerations for Managing Associated Distress. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2026
Cites 17
- REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics Pharmacological Reviews June 20, 2019
- The Subjective Effects of Psychedelics Are Necessary for Their Enduring Therapeutic Effects. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science December 10, 2020
- Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica October 30, 2020
- Classic Hallucinogens and Mystical Experiences: Phenomenology and Neural Correlates. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2018
- Psychedelics alter metaphysical beliefs. Scientific Reports November 23, 2021
and 12 more in the library