Skip to content

A new neurocognitive theory of dreams.

G. William Domhoff

Dreaming March 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1023/a:1009464416649 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Population Patients with brain injuries and children ages 3–15 in sleep laboratory studies
Citations 99
Key points The authors propose that dreaming is a developmental cognitive achievement dependent on the maturation and maintenance of a specific forebrain network. They argue its output is shaped by a "continuity principle" tied to current personal concerns and a "repetition principle" rooted in past emotional preoccupations.

Abstract

Discoveries in three distinct areas of dream research make it possible to suggest the outlines of a new neurocognitive theory of dreaming. The first relevant findings come from assessments of patients with brain injuries, which show that lesions in different areas have differential effects on dreaming and thereby imply the contours of the neural network necessary for dreaming. The second set of results comes from work with children ages 3–15 in the sleep laboratory, which reveals that only 20–30% of REM period awakenings lead to dream reports up to age 9 and that the dreams of children under age 5 are bland and static in content. The third set of findings comes from a rigorous system of content analysis, which demonstrates the repetitive nature of much dream content and that dream content in general is continuous with waking conceptions and emotional preoccupations. Based on these findings, dreaming is best understood as a developmental cognitive achievement that depends upon the maturation and maintenance of a specific network of forebrain structures. The output of this neural network for dreaming is guided by a “continuity principle” linked to current personal concerns on the one hand and a “repetition principle” rooted in past emotional preoccupations on the other.

Citations in the library

Explore topics