Skip to content

Dream Theory and Science: A Review

Soudabeh Givrad

Psychoanalytic Inquiry April 2, 2016 DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2016.1145967 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Citations 23
Key findings Argues that consensus on the origin and function of dreams remains lacking, with theories variously treating dreaming as an epiphenomenon of REM sleep or as serving emotional processing, memory consolidation, or evolutionary threat preparation. Contends that because most research has focused on adults, understanding of dreaming in children is still limited.

Abstract

Dreams are a fundamental part of our lives that have fascinated and mystified people for centuries and yet there has been little consensus on their origin and function. There are some theories that emphasize the autonomous role of deeper brain structures and see dreaming as an epiphenomenon of rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep without a meaning to decipher. Other theories indicate a role in emotional processing, memory consolidation, or evolutionary roles in preparing people to face threats when awake. Most studies have focused on exploring dreams and their neural correlates in adults, and therefore people still have a limited understanding of dreaming in children. In this review, I discuss some of the past and current findings and theories about the phenomenology, neural underpinnings, and function of dreaming in general with an emphasis on findings in children.

Citations in the library