Skip to content

The Emergence of Dreaming

G. William Domhoff

Oxford Scholarship Online September 21, 2017 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190673420.001.0001 (opens in new tab)

Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Longitudinal Cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Population Children ages 3–15 in longitudinal and cross-sectional sleep-lab studies, plus dream reports discussed in the reviewed empirical literature
Topics Dreaming
Key points Argues that dreaming is a form of waking-like thought whose neural substrate overlaps with mind-wandering and daydreaming, that most dream reports carry personal psychological meaning, and that dreaming very unlikely has an adaptive evolutionary function, though it has acquired an invented cultural function in religious and healing rituals.

Abstract

This book presents a new neurocognitive theory of dreams that documents the similarities of dreaming to waking thought, demonstrates that personal psychological meaning can be found in a majority of dream reports, has a strong developmental dimension based on excellent longitudinal and cross-sectional studies carried out in sleep labs with children ages 3–15, locates the neural substrate for dreaming in the same brain network active during mind-wandering and daydreaming, and marshals the evidence that shows it is very unlikely that dreaming has any adaptive function. These claims are based on five different sets of descriptive empirical findings that were developed between the late 1950s and the first sixteen years of the twenty-first century. All of these findings were unanticipated by scientific dream researchers and then resisted to varying degrees by dream theorists for a variety of reasons. The first five chapters spell out the theory and the evidence for it without any discussion or criticism of past theories. The next two chapters present detailed criticisms of two major alternative theories. The penultimate chapter presents evidence that it is very unlikely that dreaming has any adaptive function in the evolutionary sense of the term, although humans have invented uses for dreams in religious and healing rituals. In that regard, dreaming has an emergent function in culture that was invented in the course of history due to human cognitive capacities. The final chapter presents a general agenda for future research using new methodologies to test all of the neurocognitive hypotheses.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Dreaming: a conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research 2016 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Metaphor and hyperassociativity: the imagination mechanisms behind emotion assimilation in sleep and dreaming 2015 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Varieties of Lucid Dreaming Experience 2000 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Experimental Research on Dreaming: State of the Art and Neuropsychoanalytic Perspectives 2011 Theoretical or philosophical paper
The Neurobiology of Consciousness: Lucid Dreaming Wakes Up 2009 Theoretical or philosophical paper

Citations in the library

Cited by 10

and 5 more in the library

Related reading

Explore topics

Dreaming Meditation