Skip to content

Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness.

Morten Overgaard, Bert Timmermans, Kristian Sandberg, Axel Cleeremans

Consciousness and Cognition June 2010 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Commentary Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are problematic measures of conscious experience and seem less suited to that purpose than a direct introspective measure, contrary to Dienes and Seth's (2010) conclusion that the two methods are comparable and recommendable. The authors attribute the divergent recommendations to methodological differences between the experiments.

Abstract

Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure. Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.

Citations in the library