Skip to content

Consciousness and confidence.

David Rosenthal

Neuropsychologia May 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.018 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Confidence Gradations of consciousness Post-decision wagering
Key points Argues that confidence is less reliable than subjective report as a test for consciousness, and that difficulties with using confidence ratings to assess degrees of consciousness cast doubt on any advantage confidence might have from being more fine-grained. Proposes an explanation for the wide appeal of confidence as a measure of subjective awareness that also makes clear why it is less reliable than subjective report.

Abstract

It is natural to see conscious perceptions as typically bringing with them a degree of confidence about what is perceived. So one might also expect such confidence not to occur if a perception is not conscious. This has resulted in the use of confidence as a test or measure of consciousness, one that may be more reliable and fine-grained than the traditional appeal to subjective report as a test for a perception's being conscious. The following describes theoretical difficulties for the use of confidence as a reliable test for consciousness, which show that confidence is less reliable than subjective report. Difficulties are also presented for the use of confidence ratings in assessing degrees of consciousness, which cast doubt on any advantage confidence might have from being more fine-grained than subjective report. And an explanation is proposed for the wide appeal of using confidence to assess subjective awareness, an explanation that also makes clear why confidence is less reliable than subjective report.

Citations in the library