Skip to content

Confidence in Consciousness Science

Jorge Morales

Journal of Consciousness Studies December 1, 2025 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.32.11.206 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that confidence ratings, as a form of metacognition, offer a more promising methodological bridge between subjective experience and objective measurement in consciousness science than Spener allows, contending that her scepticism is unwarranted because confidence ratings possess objective anchors, are easy to operationalize, and correlate with subjective visibility judgments and known neural markers of awareness.

Abstract

In her book Introspection, Maja Spener urges us to split the study of introspection in two: as a mental capacity and as a scientific method. In this article, I focus on the latter and argue that metacognition in general, and confidence ratings in particular, offer a more promising methodological bridge between subjective experience and objective measurement in consciousness science than Spener allows. While Spener provides a nuanced taxonomy of introspective modes and emphasizes the importance of calibration, she remains sceptical that confidence ratings, unlike introspection as a method, reveal the conscious character of perceptual states. I contend that this scepticism is unwarranted. Confidence ratings possess objective anchors, are easy to operationalize, and correlate tightly with both subjective visibility judgments – a hallmark of introspection – and known neural markers of awareness. Empirical and theoretical considerations show that confidence and consciousness are deeply intertwined, making confidence ratings a tractable and mechanistically informed tool for consciousness and introspection research.