Skip to content

Consciousness as a graded and an all-or-none phenomenon: A conceptual analysis.

Bert Windey, Axel Cleeremans

Consciousness and Cognition September 2015 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Awareness Consciousness Dichotomous Graded Psychophysics Vision
Key points The authors argue that visual experience, as most often investigated, is both graded and all-or-none: low-level visual experience is graded, whereas high-level visual experience is all-or-none. They further propose that consciousness is a general concept encompassing multiple subconcepts, each of which may be graded, all-or-none, or both, and that specifying these subconcepts is necessary for an integrated understanding of consciousness.

Abstract

The issue whether consciousness is a graded or an all-or-none phenomenon has been and continues to be a debate. Both contradictory accounts are supported by solid evidence. Starting from a level of processing framework allowing for states of partial awareness, here we further elaborate our view that visual experience, as it is most often investigated in the literature, is both graded and all-or-none. Low-level visual experience is graded, whereas high-level visual experience is all-or-none. We then present a conceptual analysis starting from the notion that consciousness is a general concept. We specify a number of different subconcepts present in the literature on consciousness, and outline how each of them may be seen as either graded, all-or-none, or both. We argue that such specifications are necessary to lead to a detailed and integrated understanding of how consciousness should be conceived of as graded and all-or-none.

Citations in the library

Explore topics