The graded and dichotomous nature of visual awareness.
Bert Windey, Astrid Vermeiren, Anne Atas, Axel Cleeremans
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences March 17, 2014 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0282 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Humans Awareness Consciousness Visual perception Psychophysics Models, psychological Semantics Vision Dichotomous Graded |
| Key findings | The authors propose that level of processing helps reconcile competing theories of consciousness: processing low-level, non-semantic content produces graded visual experience, while processing high-level semantic content is experienced more dichotomously, a pattern they say emerges across varied stimuli, tasks, and subjective scales. |
Abstract
Is our visual experience of the world graded or dichotomous? Opposite pre-theoretical intuitions apply in different cases. For instance, when looking at a scene, one has a distinct sense that our experience has a graded character: one cannot say that there is no experience of contents that fall outside the focus of attention, but one cannot say that there is full awareness of such contents either. By contrast, when performing a visual detection task, our sense of having perceived the stimulus or not exhibits a more dichotomous character. Such issues have recently been the object of intense debate because different theoretical frameworks make different predictions about the graded versus dichotomous character of consciousness. Here, we review both relevant empirical findings as well as the associated theories (i.e. local recurrent processing versus global neural workspace theory). Next, we attempt to reconcile such contradictory theories by suggesting that level of processing is an often-ignored but highly relevant dimension through which we can cast a novel look at existing empirical findings. Thus, using a range of different stimuli, tasks and subjective scales, we show that processing low-level, non-semantic content results in graded visual experience, whereas processing high-level semantic content is experienced in a more dichotomous manner. We close by comparing our perspective with existing proposals, focusing in particular on the partial awareness hypothesis.
Citations in the library
Cited by 26
- ERP and MEG correlates of visual consciousness: The second decade. Consciousness and Cognition April 1, 2020
- Emotional priming depends on the degree of conscious experience Neuropsychologia November 10, 2017
- Four-Dimensional Graded Consciousness Frontiers in Psychology March 21, 2017
- Neural electrophysiological correlates of detection and identification awareness Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience September 1, 2023
- Consciousness: individuated information in action. Frontiers in Psychology July 29, 2015
and 21 more in the library
Cites 18
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences July 1, 2010
- Consciousness of targets during the attentional blink: a gradual or all-or-none dimension? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics November 6, 2010
- Ongoing spontaneous activity controls access to consciousness: a neuronal model for inattentional blindness. PLoS Biology June 15, 2016
- Subjective visibility depends on level of processing. Cognition November 2013
and 13 more in the library