Psychophysical "blinding" methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing.
Consciousness and Cognition September 2015 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.012 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Cortical levels Criterion content Functional levels Unconscious vision |
| Key points | The authors propose a tentative functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing in which object-substitution masking indexes the highest level, followed at progressively lower levels by crowding, attentional blink and other attentional blinding methods, backward pattern masking, metacontrast masking, continuous flash suppression, sandwich masking, and single-flash interocular suppression, with eye-based binocular-rivalry suppression lowest. They argue that this hierarchy bears on distinguishing neural correlates of conscious and unconscious vision, while the mapping onto cortical sites remains to be determined. |
Abstract
Numerous non-invasive experimental "blinding" methods exist for suppressing the phenomenal awareness of visual stimuli. Not all of these suppressive methods occur at, and thus index, the same level of unconscious visual processing. This suggests that a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing can in principle be established. The empirical results of extant studies that have used a number of different methods and additional reasonable theoretical considerations suggest the following tentative hierarchy. At the highest levels in this hierarchy is unconscious processing indexed by object-substitution masking. The functional levels indexed by crowding, the attentional blink (and other attentional blinding methods), backward pattern masking, metacontrast masking, continuous flash suppression, sandwich masking, and single-flash interocular suppression, fall at progressively lower levels, while unconscious processing at the lowest levels is indexed by eye-based binocular-rivalry suppression. Although unconscious processing levels indexed by additional blinding methods is yet to be determined, a tentative placement at lower levels in the hierarchy is also given for unconscious processing indexed by Troxler fading and adaptation-induced blindness, and at higher levels in the hierarchy indexed by attentional blinding effects in addition to the level indexed by the attentional blink. The full mapping of levels in the functional hierarchy onto cortical activation sites and levels is yet to be determined. The existence of such a hierarchy bears importantly on the search for, and the distinctions between, neural correlates of conscious and unconscious vision.
Citations in the library
Cited by 28
- Applying Linear Mixed Effects Models (LMMs) in Within-Participant Designs With Subjective Trial-Based Assessments of Awareness—a Caveat Frontiers in Psychology May 25, 2018
- Unitary and dual models of phenomenal consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition November 1, 2017
- Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2025
- Taking consciousness for real: Increasing the ecological validity of the study of conscious vs. unconscious processes. Neuron May 15, 2024
- How to operationalise consciousness Australian Journal of Psychology November 15, 2019
and 23 more in the library
Cites 13
- The Neural Correlates of Consciousness Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences March 1, 2008
- How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences July 1, 2010
- We see more than we can report: "cost free" color phenomenality outside focal attention. Psychological Science July 1, 2014
- How many kinds of consciousness? Consciousness and Cognition December 1, 2002
- Semantic Analysis Does Not Occur in the Absence of Awareness Induced by Interocular Suppression Journal of Neuroscience September 21, 2011
and 8 more in the library