Processing of subjectively and objectively invisible stimuli in human visual cortex
Timo Stein, Daniel Kaiser, Johannes J Fahrenfort, Simon van Gaal
bioRxiv November 11, 2020 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.11.376681 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational fMRI study |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 43 |
| Population | Human participants undergoing fMRI while viewing masked faces and houses |
| Key findings | Neural representations of invisible faces and houses were limited to visual shape-related properties, whereas subjectively invisible stimuli were processed up to abstract, categorical levels. The authors argue that the measured extent of unconscious processing depends on the awareness measure used, and that subjective and objective approaches are associated with different neural correlates of consciousness. |
Abstract
The study of unconscious processing requires a measure of conscious awareness. Awareness measures can be either subjective (based on participant’s report) or objective (based on perceptual performance). The preferred awareness measure depends on the theoretical position about consciousness, and may influence conclusions about the extent of unconscious processing and about the neural correlates of consciousness. We obtained fMRI measurements from 43 subjects while they viewed masked faces and houses that were either subjectively or objectively invisible. We show that neural representations of objectively invisible faces and houses are limited to visual (shape-related) object properties, while subjectively invisible stimuli are processed up to more abstract, categorical levels of representation. These results demonstrate that the hypothesized extent of unconscious information processing is determined by the measurement approach. Furthermore, our data show that subjective and objective approaches are associated with different neural correlates of consciousness and thus have implications for neural theories of consciousness.
Citations in the library
Cites 12
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- No-Report Paradigms: Extracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences November 13, 2015
- Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness Cognitive Neuroscience July 14, 2020
- A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences March 13, 2020
- Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis. Neuron March 1, 2020
and 7 more in the library