Development and Validation of the Mindfulness Meditation Practice Quality Scales (MMPQS) in a Clinical Population Using Rasch Analysis
Sarah Strohmaier, Bruno Cayoun, Alice Shires, Oleg N. Medvedev, Christian U. Krägeloh
Mindfulness September 23, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-026-02990-9 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Scale development and validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 368 |
| Population | Clinical participants undertaking Mindfulness-integrated Cognitive Behavior Therapy (MiCBT) |
| Intervention | Mindfulness-integrated Cognitive Behavior Therapy (MiCBT) |
| Measures | Mindfulness Meditation Practice Quality Scales (MMPQS) Concentration scale, Mindfulness Meditation Practice Quality Scales (MMPQS) Insight scale |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key points | A six-item version of each MMPQS scale showed high reliability (PSI 0.89–0.94), invariance across personal factors, unidimensionality, and support for construct and predictive validity, particularly divergent validity, based on correlations in expected directions. The authors conclude the scales can measure Concentration and Insight practice quality and support research and practice, recommending future testing in nonclinical, more culturally diverse samples and other mindfulness-based programs. |
Abstract
Abstract Objectives With mindfulness programs and practice research increasing, measures have been developed to assess mindfulness-related constructs. However, to our knowledge, there has not yet been a measure to examine the quality of mindfulness meditation practices. This study aimed to develop and validate the Mindfulness Meditation Practice Quality Scales (MMPQS) in a clinical population.
Method: The MMPQS consists of two scales: Concentration ( śamatha ) and Insight ( vipassanā ). Ten items were initially formulated for each scale. A total of 368 clinical participants undertaking Mindfulness-integrated Cognitive Behavior Therapy (MiCBT) contributed data, completing each scale immediately after the relevant practice on two measurement occasions; observations from both occasions were combined for Rasch analysis (Concentration n = 414; Insight n = 313). The Partial Credit Rasch model was applied to investigate psychometric properties of each scale as they represent two distinct dimensions.
Results: Best Rasch model fit was achieved after removing misfitting items resulting in six-item versions of Concentration and Insight scales. Both showed high reliability (PSI = 0.89–0.94), invariance across personal factors, and unidimensionality. Construct and predictive validity of the six-item scales were supported, with particular support for divergent validity, by correlations with relevant measures in expected directions.
Conclusions: This initial validation supported reliability and validity of the MMPQS as measures of Concentration and Insight practice quality, which can be utilized to support research and practice. Future research recommendations include testing the MMPQS in nonclinical populations, across more culturally heterogeneous samples, as well as other mindfulness-based programs.
Citations in the library
Cites 22
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation Perspectives on Psychological Science October 10, 2017
- The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation Journal of Clinical Psychology 2006
- Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse JAMA Psychiatry April 28, 2016
- Toward a unifying taxonomy and definition for meditation Frontiers in Psychology 2013
and 17 more in the library