Skip to content

Psychometric Assessment of the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) Among a Sample of Women in Treatment for Substance Use Disorder

Shaddy K. Saba, David Scott Black

Mindfulness May 20, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02144-1 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational validation study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 100
Population Women with substance use disorder engaged in a mindfulness-based intervention
Measures Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS), Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Topics Addiction Meditation
Citations 2
Key findings The AMPS and its subscales showed adequate internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.80–0.97) and correlated in expected directions with mindfulness, perceived stress, and emotion regulation measures at post-intervention. AMPS scores explained variance in emotion dysregulation beyond class attendance, mindfulness practice effort, and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (β = −0.32), suggesting the scale captures behavioral aspects of therapeutic change distinct from conventional measures.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a measure used to quantify the level at which individuals apply learned mindfulness skills during and after a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI). The AMPS was previously developed and validated among individuals with mindfulness experience and in good health. The utility of the AMPS among individuals receiving an MBI for a clinical disorder has not been examined.

Method: We tested the reliability, nomological validity, and incremental validity of the AMPS in a sample of women with substance use disorder (SUD) engaged in an MBI (n=100).

Results: AMPS and its subscales displayed adequate internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha range = 0.80–0.97) at each assessment, and test-retest reliability correlations were small to moderate in magnitude (Spearman’s ρ range = 0.22–0.74). AMPS scores averaged across assessments correlated with conceptually related measures in the expected directions at post-intervention (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, (FFMQ,) r = 0.44, p < 0.01; Perceived Stress Scale, PSS, (PSS) r = −0.30, p < 0.01; Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale, (DERS,) r = −0.48, p < 0.01). AMPS explained variance in DERS beyond conventional mindfulness measures (MBI class attendance, mindfulness practice effort, FFMQ) at post-intervention (β = −0.32, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The AMPS broadens the ability to capture behavioral aspects associated with therapeutic change that are distinct from conventional measures of practice quantity and mindfulness disposition. The measure yields predictive value for emotion dysregulation, a common target of MBIs. Factor analytic work is needed in clinical, novice meditator samples. Preregistration This study was not preregistered.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on addiction, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ayahuasca-Assisted Therapy for Addiction: Results from a Preliminary Observational Study in Canada Rural aboriginal population 2013 Observational study
Dynamic coupling of whole-brain neuronal and neurotransmitter systems Healthy humans 2020 Observational study
Psychedelics not linked to mental health problems or suicidal behavior: A population study Randomly selected United States adults 2015 Observational cohort n = 135,095
Breakdown of long-range temporal dependence in default mode and attention networks during deep sleep Human participants across the nonrapid eye movement sleep cycle 2013 Observational cohort
Assessment of addiction severity among ritual users of ayahuasca Regular ayahuasca users (jungle-based and urban-based) and matched controls 2010 Observational cohort n = 127

Citations in the library

Explore topics