Skip to content

Low-Intensity Guided Help Through Mindfulness (LIGHTMIND): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing supported Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy self-help to supported Cognitive Behavioural Therapy self-help for adults experiencing depression

Clara Strauss, Amy Arbon, Michael Barkham, Sarah Byford, Rebecca S. Crane, Richard De Visser, Margaret Heslin, Anna-Marie Jones, Fergal Jones, Laura Lea, Glenys Parry, Claire Rosten, Kate Cavanagh

preprint DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.24697/v1 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial protocol
Sample size 410
Population Adults experiencing mild to moderate depression recruited from IAPT services in England
Interventions Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy self-help (MBCT-SH) cognitive behavioural therapy self-help (CBT-SH)
Duration 16-week workbook completion period with six support sessions; follow-up duration not stated
Topics Depression Meditation
Key findings The protocol proposes testing whether supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy self-help is more effective than supported cognitive behavioural therapy self-help for mild to moderate depression in IAPT services, with an exploratory non-inferiority analysis if the primary hypothesis is not supported. The authors argue that MBCT's different focus, approach and practice may improve outcomes and treatment completion.

Abstract

Abstract Background Depression has serious personal, family and economic consequences. It is estimated that it will cost £12.15 billion to the economy each year in England by 2026. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is the National Health Service talking therapies service in England for adults experiencing anxiety or depression. Over 1 million people are referred to IAPT every year, over half experiencing depression. Where symptoms of depression are mild/moderate, people are typically offered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) self-help supported by a psychological wellbeing practitioner (PWP). The problem is that over half of people who complete treatment for depression in IAPT remain depressed despite receiving National Institute of Health and Care Excellent (NICE) recommended treatment. Furthermore, less than half of IAPT service users complete treatment. This study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of an alternative to CBT self-help. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy differs from CBT in focus, approach and practice and may be more effective with a higher number of treatment completions. Methods/Design This is a definitive randomised controlled trial comparing supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy self-help (MBCT-SH) with supported cognitive behavioural therapy self-help (CBT-SH) for adults experiencing mild/moderate depression being treated in IAPT services. Four hundred and ten participants experiencing mild/moderate depression will be recruited from IAPT services and randomised to receive either an MBCT-based self-help workbook or a CBT-based self-help workbook. Participants will be asked to complete their workbook within 16 weeks, with six support sessions with a PWP. The primary outcome is depression symptom severity upon treatment completion. Secondary outcomes are treatment completion rates and measures of generalized anxiety, wellbeing, functioning and mindfulness. An exploratory non-inferiority analysis will be conducted in the event the primary hypothesis is not supported. A semi-structured interview with participants will guide understanding of change processes. Discussion If the findings from this randomised controlled trial demonstrate that MBCT-SH is more effective than CBT-SH for adults experiencing depression, this will provide evidence for policy makers and lead to changes to clinical practice in IAPT services, leading to greater choice of self-help treatment options and better outcomes for service users. If the exploratory non-inferiority analysis is conducted and this indicates non-inferiority of MBCT-SH in comparison to CBT-SH this will also be of interest to policy makers when seeking to increase service user choice of self-help treatment options for depression.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
A Randomized Trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression Subjects with DSM-IV major depression (treatment resistant) 2006 Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study n = 18
Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2000 Randomized controlled trial n = 145
Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial Cancer patients with life-threatening diagnoses and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety 2016 Randomized controlled trial n = 51
Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial Patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression 2016 Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial n = 29
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: Replication and Exploration of Differential Relapse Prevention Effects. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2004 Randomized controlled trial n = 73

Citations in the library

Explore topics