Skip to content

Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology

Thomas Metzinger

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness March 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1142/s270507852150003x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Proposes a global moratorium until 2050 on research that directly aims at or knowingly risks creating artificial consciousness on post-biotic carrier systems, and outlines a process for refining this ban through rational, evidence-based constraints that could lead to repeal, extension, or a more nuanced policy.

Abstract

This paper has a critical and a constructive part. The first part formulates a political demand, based on ethical considerations: Until 2050, there should be a global moratorium on synthetic phenomenology, strictly banning all research that directly aims at or knowingly risks the emergence of artificial consciousness on post-biotic carrier systems. The second part lays the first conceptual foundations for an open-ended process with the aim of gradually refining the original moratorium, tying it to an ever more fine-grained, rational, evidence-based, and hopefully ethically convincing set of constraints. The systematic research program defined by this process could lead to an incremental reformulation of the original moratorium. It might result in a moratorium repeal even before 2050, in the continuation of a strict ban beyond the year 2050, or a gradually evolving, more substantial, and ethically refined view of which — if any — kinds of conscious experience we want to implement in AI systems.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics