Skip to content

Fidelity of Mindfulness Training and Delivery for Adolescent Mental and Metabolic Health

Sarah E. D. Perzow, Michele Chen, Samantha Bothwell, Lauren D. Gulley, Rachel G. Lucas‐Thompson, Laura Pyle, Talia Thompson, Natalia Sanchez, Doris Elizabeth Estrada, Marian Tanofsky-Kraff, Megan K. Kelsey, Eleanor R Mackey, Lauren B Shomaker

Mindfulness September 3, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-026-02975-8 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Pilot randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 17
Population Facilitators at four U.S. sites trained to deliver group interventions to adolescents at risk for type 2 diabetes with elevated depression symptoms
Intervention cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
Topics Meditation
Registration NCT04992299
Key findings Facilitators achieved the prespecified 80% threshold for knowledge, competence, and adherence after standardized training, with knowledge scores improving significantly in all three conditions and median competence/adherence ratings meeting or exceeding 80% in both mock and pilot sessions. The authors report that results support the feasibility of high-fidelity training and implementation of MBI, CBT, and HE across diverse settings.

Abstract

Adolescent-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing, and depression symptoms amplify T2D risk, highlighting the need for interventions addressing mental and metabolic health. This multisite pilot RCT assessed whether facilitators could be trained consistently to deliver group MBI, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and a matched health education condition (HE) to adolescents at risk for T2D with elevated depression symptoms. It was hypothesized that facilitators would achieve ≥ 80% on knowledge, competence, and adherence following standardized training. Facilitators at four U.S. sites received training in MBI, CBT, and/or HE through didactics and supervised virtual mock sessions. Training fidelity was assessed through pre/post-training knowledge tests and expert ratings of adherence/competence in mock sessions. Intervention delivery fidelity was assessed with expert ratings of virtual pilot group sessions with adolescents. Contamination across conditions was evaluated. Seventeen facilitators were trained in MBI ( n = 11), CBT ( n = 10), and/or HE ( n = 9). Descriptive feasibility metrics are presented; between-arm comparisons are not made. Knowledge scores improved across conditions (MBI: 76% → 96%, p = 0.01; CBT: 68% → 92%, p = 0.01; HE: 84% → 96%, p = 0.02). Median competence/adherence met or exceeded the 80% threshold for mock (MBI = 80%/85%, CBT = 86%/90%, HE = 82.5%/80%) and pilot (MBI = 90%/100%, CBT = 90%/90%, HE = 97.5%/96%) sessions. Contamination was limited to overlapping MBI-CBT content. Results support the feasibility of high-fidelity training and implementation of MBI, CBT, and HE across diverse settings, informing future research into integrated adolescent health prevention strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04992299.