Skip to content

Reinterpreting Anne Conway: A Cosmopsychist Ontology of Created Substance?

Duncan Lee

Sophia April 10, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s11841-025-01062-0 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Anne Conway's ontology of created substance is analogous in form and intention to contemporary panpsychism, and proposes that synthesizing this reading with Emily Thomas's priority monism yields 'cosmopsychism', which the author contends is consistent with many of Conway's remarks and has theological implications.

Abstract

Anne Conway’s ontology about created substance in The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy has often been proposed to be a form of existence monism or existence pluralism. More recently, Emily Thomas has been suggested that it might sit better as a form of priority monism (Thomas, 2020). While the literature remains rife on such matters, there has been little contemporary consideration as to what this substance is in-and-of-itself. I provide a novel answer to this question by presenting how Conway’s ontology is analogous in form and intention to contemporary variants of panpsychism. Combining this conclusion with Thomas’, I propose that the theory resulting from the synthesis of these two conclusions – ‘cosmopsychism’ – is consistent with many of Conway’s remarks and has some interesting theological implications for the text.

Citations in the library