Skip to content

On The Infinitely Hard Problem Of Consciousness

Bernard Molyneux

Australasian Journal of Philosophy June 9, 2010 DOI: 10.1080/00048401003745985 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Citations 8
Key points Argues that the hard problem of consciousness arises from a recursively degenerate application of Leibniz's Law, making the identification of phenomenal and physical concept referents require infinitely many operations, and predicts an ineliminable dissatisfaction with any physicalist theory of consciousness.

Abstract

I show that the recursive structure of Leibniz's Law requires agents to perform infinitely many operations to psychologically identify the referents of phenomenal and physical concepts, even though the referents of ordinary concepts (e.g. Hesperus and Phosphorus) can be identified in a finite number of steps. The resulting problem resembles the hard problem of consciousness in the fact that it appears (and indeed is) unsolvable by anyone for whom it arises, and in the fact that it invites dualist and eliminativist responses. Moreover, if this is the hard problem then we can predict that regardless of the strength of the argument for physicalism, and regardless of physicalism's truth, an ineliminable dissatisfaction is bound to accompany any physicalist theory of consciousness. Accordingly, I suggest that this is the hard problem of consciousness, and therefore that the hard problem arises from a recursively degenerate application of Leibniz's Law.