Being Mindful with Discernment: Development and Validation of the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale (MDS)
Hin-Tak Sik, Ben C. L. Yu, Ryan M. K. Chan, Connie Y Y Ho, Winnie W. S. Mak
Mindfulness March 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-026-02770-5 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Scale development and validation study Preregistered Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1,043 |
| Population | Adults from the general population (samples of 500, 397, and 146) |
| Duration | Half-day mindfulness retreat |
| Measures | Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, mental health indicators, psychological distress indicators, nonattachment |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key points | The Mindfulness-Discernment Scale (MDS) has a two-bifactor structure with 24 items, shows good construct validity and incremental value over the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, and is sensitive to mindfulness practice as demonstrated by a half-day retreat. |
Abstract
Abstract Objectives The current definitions and conceptualizations of mindfulness, as well as the derived measurements based on them, are subject to much controversy and debate. The present study aimed to develop and validate a new mindfulness scale based on original Buddhist teachings—the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale (MDS).
Method: In the first study (for Step 1 Scale Construction and Step 2 Scale Validation), an operational definition of mindfulness based on Buddhist teachings and 48 items of mindfulness deriving from this definition were sent to Buddhist experts to establish content validity. Then, exploratory factor analysis (EFA; Sample 1, n = 500) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; Sample 2, n = 397) were performed to explore and confirm the factor structure of the MDS. Using the data from Sample 2, construct validity and incremental value of the MDS were investigated by Pearson zero-order correlations and hierarchical multiple regression analyses, respectively. In the second study (for Step 3 Scale Sensitivity to Change; n = 146), a half-day mindfulness retreat was conducted to test the sensitivity of the MDS to mindfulness practice.
Results: The results of Step 1 and Step 2 suggested a two-bifactor structure for the MDS which consists of 24 items in total. The MDS showed significant positive correlations with various secularized Buddhist-related constructs and mental health indicators and significant negative correlations with psychological distress indicators in general. The MDS also showed incremental value over the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale on mental health indicators and nonattachment. The results of Step 3 supported that the MDS is sensitive to mindfulness practice.
Conclusions: The present research highlighted the important role of discernment in the conceptualization of mindfulness and related practice, through facilitating the evaluation of mental states and recognizing what would be beneficial to well-being. Preregistration This study was not preregistered.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
- Discerning Mindfulness or Nonjudging Mindfulness? Investigating the Relative Temporal Association of Discerning and Nonjudging Quality with Nonattachment and Mental Health Mindfulness September 7, 2026
- Bridging the Gap Between Contemporary and Buddhist Definitions of Mindfulness: A Scoping Review Mindfulness October 3, 2026
Cites 24
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2004
- Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2003
- Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report Assessment September 1, 2004
and 19 more in the library