Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items.
Attila Lengyel, Danica Keczeli, Róbert Orosz, Zoltán Bács, Anetta Müller, Szilvia Szőke, Éva Bácsné Bába
Frontiers in Psychology July 21, 2021 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Scale validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | University of Debrecen students, public employees, and secondary school teachers |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Methodological issues Construal level Scale validation Trait mindfulness Short scale |
| Key points | The positively worded six-item Mindful Presence Scale (MPSp) demonstrated a stable two-factor structure and the best psychometric properties, with confirmatory factor analysis showing excellent fit and measurement invariance across gender. The high-level and low-level construal subscales did not differ significantly in factorial stability but differed significantly in predicting scores on some concurrent instruments. |
Abstract
Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire-based online studies were conducted. Study 1 drew three samples (n n = 391, n p = 215, and n b = 235) from the students at the University of Debrecen. It examined the factor structure, reliability, and internal consistency of the three differently worded scale versions. The positively worded scale version (MPSp) yielded a stable two-factor structure and demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Study 2 performed a confirmatory factor analysis on a sample drawn from public employees across the country (n cfa = 420). The two-factor solution in Study 1 was confirmed. χ2 tests were not significant, and fit indices were excellent. There was no significant difference between the high-level construal subscale (Fhlc) and the low-level construal subscale (Fllc) in terms of factorial stability. Participant of Study 3 were students who did not take part in Study 1. The sample (n inv = 250) was tested for measurement invariance across gender. The scaled results supported strong/threshold invariance. Study 4 tested concurrent validity with 10 concurrent instruments. A sample of secondary school teachers (n con = 128) was tested by examining Spearman's rank order correlations. There was a significant difference in how the Fhlc and Fllc subscales predicted scores of some of the concurrent instruments. Further research is warranted into how the construal level of mindfulness scale items affects the recollection of the mindful experience. Overall, MPSp proved to be a valid short mindfulness measure.
Citations in the library
Cites 17
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2004
- Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Assessment February 29, 2008
- Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report Assessment September 1, 2004
- Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation Perspectives on Psychological Science October 10, 2017
and 12 more in the library