Effects of compassion meditation on a psychological model of charitable donation.
Yoni K Ashar, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Tal Yarkoni, Jenifer Sills, Joan Halifax, Sona Dimidjian, Tor D Wager
Emotion (Washington, D.C.) August 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1037/emo0000119 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractTwo studies developed and tested a psychological model of compassionate behavior, measured as real-money charitable donations. Study 1 found that a combination of tenderness, personal distress, perceived blamelessness, and perceived instrumental value of helping predicted donations with high accuracy (r = .67), while perceived similarity did not add predictive power. Study 2, a randomized controlled trial, showed that a smartphone-based Compassion Meditation (CM) program increased donations relative to control conditions (placebo oxytocin and a Familiarity intervention), and changes in the Study 1 model mediated this effect. The Familiarity intervention decreased primary outcomes, while placebo oxytocin had no significant effects. The work offers a quantitative model and insights into CM's active ingredients.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Interventions | Compassion Meditation placebo oxytocin Familiarity intervention |
| Key finding | Compassion Meditation increased charitable donations relative to control conditions, and changes in feelings and attributions (tenderness, personal distress, perceived blamelessness, instrumental value) mediated this effect. |
Abstract
Compassion is critical for societal wellbeing. Yet, it remains unclear how specific thoughts and feelings motivate compassionate behavior, and we lack a scientific understanding of how to effectively cultivate compassion. Here, we conducted 2 studies designed to a) develop a psychological model predicting compassionate behavior, and b) test this model as a mediator of a Compassion Meditation (CM) intervention and identify the "active ingredients" of CM. In Study 1, we developed a model predicting compassionate behavior, operationalized as real-money charitable donation, from a linear combination of self-reported tenderness, personal distress, perceived blamelessness, and perceived instrumental value of helping with high cross-validated accuracy, r = .67, p < .0001. Perceived similarity to suffering others did not predict charitable donation when controlling for other feelings and attributions. In Study 2, a randomized controlled trial, we tested the Study 1 model as a mediator of CM and investigated active ingredients. We compared a smartphone-based CM program to 2 conditions-placebo oxytocin and a Familiarity intervention-to control for expectancy effects, demand characteristics, and familiarity effects. Relative to control conditions, CM increased charitable donations, and changes in the Study 1 model of feelings and attributions mediated this effect (pab = .002). The Familiarity intervention led to decreases in primary outcomes, while placebo oxytocin had no significant effects on primary outcomes. Overall, this work contributes a quantitative model of compassionate behavior, and informs our understanding of the change processes and intervention components of CM. (PsycINFO Database Record