A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Workplace Mindfulness Training Randomized Controlled Trials
Larissa Bartlett, Angela J. Martin, A. Neil, K. Memish, P. Otáhal, M. Kilpatrick, K. Sanderson
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology February 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000146 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractWorkplace mindfulness training produces small to moderate beneficial effects on mindfulness, stress, anxiety, psychological distress, well-being, and sleep, according to a meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials. Effect sizes ranged from g = 0.26 for sleep to g = 0.69 for psychological distress. No reliable conclusions could be drawn for burnout (ambiguous results), depression (publication bias), or work performance (insufficient data). The authors consider how mindfulness might fit with job demands-resources, coping, and prevention theories of work stress, and they note limitations in study designs and reporting.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Workplace employees |
| Intervention | workplace mindfulness training |
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology |
| Key finding | Workplace mindfulness training yields small to moderate beneficial effects on mindfulness, stress, anxiety, psychological distress, well-being, and sleep, but no conclusions could be drawn for burnout, depression, or work performance. |
Abstract
This meta-analytic review responds to promises in the research literature and public domain about the benefits of workplace mindfulness training. It synthesizes randomized controlled trial evidence from workplace-delivered training for changes in mindfulness, stress, mental health, well-being, and work performance outcomes. Going beyond extant reviews, this article explores the influence of variability in workforce and intervention characteristics for reducing perceived stress. Meta-effect estimates (Hedge’s g) were computed using data from 23 studies. Results indicate beneficial effects following training for mindfulness (g = 0.45, p < .001) and stress (g = 0.56, p < .001), anxiety (g = 0.62, p < .001) and psychological distress (g = 0.69, p < .001), and for well-being (g = 0.46, p = .002) and sleep (g = 0.26, p = .003). No conclusions could be drawn from pooled data for burnout due to ambivalence in results, for depression due to publication bias, or for work performance due to insufficient data. The potential for integrating the construct of mindfulness within job demands-resources, coping, and prevention theories of work stress is considered in relation to the results. Limitations to study designs and reporting are addressed, and recommendations to advance research in this field are made.